Watkins v. Medeiros
| SEAN MEDEIROS, Superintendent |
| KYLE WATKINS |
| 20-1194 |
| February 27, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. Docket entries: 56, 70, and 71. [20-1194] (GRC) [Entered: 04/21/2020 04:07 PM] |
ORDER directing district court to issue or deny a certificate of appealability. [20-1194] (GRC) [Entered: 04/13/2020 12:58 PM]
|
|
ORDER denying as moot motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Kyle Watkins. [20-1194] (GAK) [Entered: 04/06/2020 10:21 AM]
|
|
ORDER entered: Upon consideration of appellant's motion to consolidate appeal no. 19-2080 with appeal no. 19-2132, the motion is allowed. The appeals are hereby consolidated for briefing and oral argument. [20-1108, 20-1194] (GRC) [Entered: 03/27/2020 12:25 PM]
|
| RENEWED MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Kyle Watkins in 20-1108, 20-1194. Certificate of service dated 03/23/2020. [20-1108, 20-1194] (JHP) [Entered: 03/23/2020 02:01 PM] |
|
ORDER entered by Juan R. Torruella, Appellate Judge. The motion to appoint counsel is denied without prejudice to reconsideration upon the filing of a motion providing detailed argument as to why counsel should be appointed in this case. See Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987) (prisoners do not have a constitutional right to counsel in habeas proceedings); cf. 28 U.S.C. 2254(h) (court "may" appoint counsel in 2254 proceedings). [20-1194] (GAK) [Entered: 03/20/2020 05:46 PM]
|
| MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Kyle Watkins. [20-1194] (GRC) [Entered: 03/23/2020 01:03 PM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Kyle Watkins in 20-1194, 20-1108. Certificate of service dated 03/10/2020. [20-1194, 20-1108] (JHP) [Entered: 03/10/2020 12:36 PM] |
| MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Kyle Watkins in 20-1194.. Certificate of service dated 03/10/2020. [20-1194, 20-1108] CLERK'S NOTE: The ECF filer did not select the option that best describes the document. Correction made by clerk's office. No further action required. (JHP) [Entered: 03/10/2020 12:39 PM] |
| MOTION to consolidate cases filed by Appellant Kyle Watkins in 20-1194, 20-1108. Certificate of service dated 03/10/2020. [20-1194, 20-1108] (JHP) [Entered: 03/10/2020 12:42 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #58) filed by Appellant Kyle Watkins. Docketing Statement and Appearance form due 03/12/2020. [20-1194] (MNH) [Entered: 02/27/2020 06:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Watkins v. Medeiros | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: SEAN MEDEIROS, Superintendent | |
| Represented By: | Susanne G. Reardon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: KYLE WATKINS | |
| Represented By: | Janet Hetherwick Pumphrey |
| Represented By: | Kyle Watkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
