Kupperstein v. Schall, et al
| JOHN P. FITZGERALD and DEBORA A. CASEY |
| DONALD C. KUPPERSTEIN |
| THOMAS SHEEDY, c/o Bostonian Legal Grouop, LLC, One Boston Place, 26th Floor, MA 02108 and THOMAS SHEEDY, c/o Bostonian Legal Group, LLC, One Boston Place, 26th Floor, MA 02108 |
| EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and IRENE SCHALL, Personal Representative |
| 20-1262 |
| March 2, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION to reconsider judgment case terminated [ # 6333914-2 ] filed by Appellant Donald C. Kupperstein. Certificate of service dated 04/23/2020. [20-1262] (DGB) [Entered: 04/23/2020 05:19 PM] |
| JUDGMENT entered by Jeffrey R. Howard, Chief Appellate Judge; Rogeriee Thompson, Appellate Judge and William J. Kayatta, Jr., Appellate Judge: In the event the appellees do renew their request for sanctions by separately filed motion, Kupperstein should respond to that motion within 14 days of service. Extensions of these deadlines should not be expected, and these deadlines are not subject to the general extension order entered by the Chief Judge on March 26, 2020. The court retains jurisdiction to the extent necessary to adjudicate any sanctions motion that might be filed. The appeal is DISMISSED . See Local Rule 27.0(c) (court may dismiss for lack of jurisdiction at any time). [20-1262] (AL) [Entered: 04/22/2020 03:52 PM] |
| NOTICE issued. After 05/13/2020, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: John P. Fitzgerald for John P. Fitzgerald and Mark C. Rossi for Thomas Sheedy. [20-1262] (AL) [Entered: 03/30/2020 09:50 AM] |
| RESPONSE filed by Appellant Donald C. Kupperstein to order general show cause [ # 6323502-2 ]. Certificate of service dated 03/12/2020. [20-1262] (DGB) [Entered: 03/12/2020 02:10 PM] |
ORDER entered: This is an appeal from a district court order denying stay and/or injunctive relief in connection with a deposition scheduled for March 3, 2020. Appellant moved for injunctive relief before this court, and that motion also was denied by order entered March 3, 2020. The scheduled date for the relevant deposition has passed. This raises a question of potential mootness. Accordingly, within 10 days of entry of this order, appellant is directed either to withdraw the appeal or to explain why the appeal should not be dismissed as moot. Failure to respond within ten (10) days of entry of this order will result in dismissal. [20-1262] (AL) [Entered: 03/10/2020 01:48 PM]
|
|
ORDER entered by Juan R. Torruella, Appellate Judge; Sandra L. Lynch, Appellate Judge and William J. Kayatta, Jr., Appellate Judge: The "emergency motion for protective order or stay pending appeal" is DENIED . [20-1262] (AL) [Entered: 03/03/2020 11:13 AM]
|
| MOTION to award fees and costs and RESPONSE to motion [ # 6321408-2 ] filed by Appellees Irene Schall and Executive Office of Health and Human Services. Certificate of service dated 03/03/2020. [20-1262] (RS) [Entered: 03/03/2020 08:16 AM] |
| EMERGENCY MOTION to stay pending appeal filed by Appellant Donald C. Kupperstein. Certificate of service dated 03/02/2020. [20-1262] (AL) [Entered: 03/02/2020 05:40 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Donald C. Kupperstein filed by Attorney David G. Baker. Certificate of service dated 03/02/2020. [20-1262] (DGB) [Entered: 03/02/2020 06:05 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #48) filed by Appellant Donald C. Kupperstein. Docketing Statement, Transcript Report/Order form and Appearance form due 03/16/2020. [20-1262] (AL) [Entered: 03/02/2020 05:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
