Poole, et al v. US Bank
STEPHEN R. POOLE and CYNTHIA J. POOLE |
US BANK, as trustee on behalf of the holders of the JPMorgan Acquisition Trust 2006-WMC2 Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006 WMC-2 |
20-1381 |
April 9, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
APPELLANTS' BRIEF filed by Appellants Cynthia J. Poole and Stephen R. Poole. Certificate of service dated 05/19/2020. Three paper copies identical to that of the electronically filed brief must be submitted so that they are received by the court on or before 06/16/2020 . Brief due 06/18/2020 for APPELLEE US Bank. [20-1381] (LIM) [Entered: 06/02/2020 08:53 PM] |
BRIEF tendered by Appellants Stephen R. Poole and Cynthia J. Poole. [20-1381] (SRP) [Entered: 05/19/2020 01:23 PM] |
BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 05/20/2020 for appellant Cynthia J. Poole and Stephen R. Poole. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [20-1381] (RMK) [Entered: 04/10/2020 04:27 PM] |
ORDER entered: This court has docketed plaintiffs-appellants' pro se appeal from the order of dismissal entered on January 28, 2020 in No. 4:19-cv-11495-TSH (D. Mass.). The notice of appeal is signed only by plaintiff-appellant Stephen R. Poole, purportedly on behalf of both himself and co-plaintiff-appellant Cynthia J. Poole. Although Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(2) provides that a pro se notice of appeal is considered filed on behalf of the signer and the signer's spouse, a lay person may represent only him or herself. Accordingly, all pleadings filed on behalf of Cynthia J. Poole must be signed by her if she is proceeding pro se , or by counsel appearing on her behalf. [20-1381] (RMK) [Entered: 04/10/2020 04:24 PM] |
Request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal filed by Appellants Cynthia J. Poole and Stephen R. Poole was granted in the district court by order dated 03/31/2020. [20-1381] (RMK) [Entered: 04/09/2020 01:15 PM] |
CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #18) filed by Appellants Cynthia J. Poole and Stephen R. Poole. [20-1381] (RMK) [Entered: 04/09/2020 01:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Poole, et al v. US Bank | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: STEPHEN R. POOLE | |
Represented By: | Stephen R. Poole |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: CYNTHIA J. POOLE | |
Represented By: | Cynthia J. Poole |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: US BANK, as trustee on behalf of the holders of the JPMorgan Acquisition Trust 2006-WMC2 Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006 WMC-2 | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey D. Adams |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.