Hall v. Capeless, et al
EME, through Adam Lee Michael Hall, Guardian AD-Litem and father of EME, a minor and a victim of defendants |
DAVID F. CAPELESS, in his official capacity, and his personal capacity, MARY COUGHLIN, ROSE DAWSON, JOSEPH A. PIEROPAN, ERIN GOFFNEY, Director Classification Division, D.O.C., ALAN J. BLACK, attorney, ALEXANDRA ELY, JENNIFER BOYTS, JEFFREY C. KINDER, Judge, CAROL A. MICI, Commissioner of DOC, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, DAVID F. CAPELESS, in his official capacity and his personal capacity and ERIN GAFFNEY, Director Classification Division, DOC |
ADAM HALL |
20-1394 |
April 9, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
RESPONSE filed by Appellant Adam Hall to order for lack of jurisdiction [ # 6337854-2 ]. Certificate of service was not included. [20-1394] (ALW) [Entered: 05/29/2020 06:43 PM] |
ORDER entered: Because the challenged Memorandum and Order does not appear to be a final, appealable order, this court may not have jurisdiction to review the above-referenced appeal. Accordingly, plaintiff-appellant is ordered either to move for voluntary dismissal of the instant appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) or to show cause, in writing, why it should not be dismissed. Failure to take either action by June 10, 2020 may result in dismissal of the appeal for want of diligent prosecution. See 1st Cir. R. 3.0(b). [20-1394] (ALW) [Entered: 05/11/2020 04:43 PM] |
CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #16) filed by Appellant Adam Hall. Fee due 05/26/2020. [20-1394] (KPC) [Entered: 04/09/2020 04:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.