Amesbury v. City of Pawtucket, et al
DONNA M. PINTO, PAWTUCKET, RI, MELISSA C., Zoning and Code Enforcement, MICHAEL POLACECK, PAWTUCKET POLICE DEPARTMENT and DONALD R. GREBIEN |
MARK E. AMESBURY, d/b/a Polytechnic |
20-1447 |
April 27, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER entered. The notice of default issued on June 12, 2020 is hereby vacated as it was issued in error. [20-1447] (GAK) [Entered: 06/16/2020 05:00 PM] |
NOTICE of default and intent to dismiss for failure to pay the filing fee. Fee due 06/26/2020. [20-1447] (GAK) [Entered: 06/12/2020 01:19 PM] |
ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief filed by Appellant Mark E. Amesbury. Brief due 07/10/2020 for appellant Mark E. Amesbury. [20-1447] (ALW) [Entered: 06/03/2020 09:17 PM] |
MOTION to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant Mark E. Amesbury. Certificate of service dated 06/03/2020. [20-1447] (MEA) [Entered: 06/03/2020 04:27 PM] |
BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 06/10/2020 for appellant Mark E. Amesbury. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. Please see the court's general order issued April 20, 2020, requiring the electronic filing of appendices. [20-1447] (ALW) [Entered: 05/01/2020 12:26 AM] |
CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #15) filed by Appellant Mark E. Amesbury. Fee due 05/11/2020. [20-1447] (MNH) [Entered: 04/27/2020 08:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.