Sena v. Kenneway
| STEVEN KENNEWAY, Superintendent, MCI-Shirley |
| DENNIS SENA |
| 20-1471 |
| April 27, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Dennis Sena indicating all necessary transcripts have already been filed in district court. Certificate of service was not included. [20-1471] (RMK) [Entered: 06/05/2020 10:59 AM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and appendix due 07/15/2020 for appellant Dennis Sena. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. Please see the court's general order issued April 20, 2020, requiring the electronic filing of appendices. [20-1471] (RMK) [Entered: 06/05/2020 11:02 AM] |
ORDER entered. The district court granted petitioner-appellant's request for a certificate of appealability. Accordingly, pursuant to Grant-Chase v. Commissioner, 145 F.3d 431 (1st Circuit. 1998), this appeal can go forward on the issue(s) for which the district court granted the certificate. [20-1471] (RMK) [Entered: 05/27/2020 10:04 AM]
|
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Dennis Sena. Certificate of service dated 05/26/2020. [20-1471] (RMK) [Entered: 05/27/2020 05:08 PM] |
| SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. Docket entries: Order granting CAP entered on May 20, 2020.. [20-1471] (DPO) [Entered: 05/21/2020 03:21 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Dennis Sena filed by Attorney Jonathan Scott Lauer. Certificate of service dated 05/20/2020. [20-1471] (JSL) [Entered: 05/20/2020 10:27 PM] |
| NOTICE issued. After 05/27/2020, the following attorney will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless he registers for an appellate ECF account: Scott Lauer for Dennis Sena. [20-1471] (RMK) [Entered: 05/13/2020 06:48 PM] |
| NOTICE of default and intent to dismiss issued. The appellant is directed to file an appearance form, docketing statement and transcript report/order form or this case will be dismissed for lack of prosecution in accordance with 1st Cir. R. 3.0(b). Appearance form, Docketing Statement, and Transcript report/order form due 05/27/2020 . [20-1471] (RMK) [Entered: 05/13/2020 07:32 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #62) filed by Appellant Dennis Sena. Docketing Statement, Appearance Form, and Transcript Report/Order form due 05/11/2020. [20-1471] (RMK) [Entered: 04/27/2020 12:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Sena v. Kenneway | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: STEVEN KENNEWAY, Superintendent, MCI-Shirley | |
| Represented By: | Gabriel Thomas Thornton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: DENNIS SENA | |
| Represented By: | Scott Lauer |
| Represented By: | Dennis Sena |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
