Lath v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC, et al
CREDIT SUISSES FIRST BOSTON MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP. |
PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES, LLC and CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP. |
SANJEEV LATH |
20-1482 |
May 4, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 07/13/2020 for appellant Sanjeev Lath. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. Please see the court's general order issued April 20, 2020, requiring the electronic filing of appendices. [20-1482] (RMK) [Entered: 06/03/2020 04:55 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Sanjeev Lath indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. Certificate of service dated 06/03/2020. [20-1482] (SL) [Entered: 06/03/2020 12:21 PM] |
NOTICE of default issued. Appellant failed to file a transcript report/order form by the deadline. If transcripts are necessary for this appeal, appellant is directed to file a transcript order form by 06/04/2020. Absent a timely response, this court will set a briefing schedule, if appropriate. [20-1482] (RMK) [Entered: 05/21/2020 02:49 PM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee PennyMac Loan Services, LLC filed by Attorney Kevin P. Polansky. Certificate of service dated 05/05/2020. [20-1482] (KPP) [Entered: 05/05/2020 03:49 PM] |
CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #70) filed by Appellant Sanjeev Lath. Transcript Report/Order form due 05/19/2020. [20-1482] (GRC) [Entered: 05/05/2020 12:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.