Woollam v. Cowen
| DEREK WOOLLAM |
| MAURA T. HEALEY, Attorney General of Massachusetts and BRAD COWEN, Superintendent of MCI-Norfolk |
| 20-1543 |
| June 3, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER granting motion to extend time to request certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Derek Woollam. Memorandum supporting issuance of CAP due 10/23/2020 . No further extension of this deadline should be expected. [20-1543] (RMK) [Entered: 06/29/2020 05:16 PM]
|
| ASSENTED TO MOTION to extend time to request a certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Derek Woollam. Certificate of service dated 06/26/2020. [20-1543] (DHM) [Entered: 06/26/2020 04:15 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Brad Cowen filed by Attorney Anna Lumelsky. Certificate of service dated 06/18/2020. [20-1543] (AEL) [Entered: 06/18/2020 04:18 PM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Derek Woollam. Certificate of service dated 06/16/2020. [20-1543] (DHM) [Entered: 06/16/2020 08:23 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Derek Woollam filed by Attorney David H. Mirsky. Certificate of service dated 06/16/2020. [20-1543] (DHM) [Entered: 06/16/2020 08:16 AM] |
|
ORDER directing petitioner to file a request for a certificate of appealabilty in this court by 07/09/2020. Date of denial by district court: May 22, 2020. [20-1543] (RMK) [Entered: 06/09/2020 10:31 AM]
|
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #41) filed by Appellant Derek Woollam. Apperance Form and Docketing Statement due 06/17/2020. [20-1543] (RMK) [Entered: 06/03/2020 11:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
