Theodore, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Defendant / Appellant: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee: ACCESS WITH SUCCESS ACCESS WITH SUCCESS, INC. and DINO N. THEODORE, on behalf of himself and all persons similarly situated
Case Number: 20-1574
Filed: June 16, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER to Show Cause entered. Appellant is directed either to move for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) or to show cause August 19, 2020 in writing, why this appeal should not be dismissed as moot. The failure to take either action by may lead to dismissal of the appeal for lack of diligent prosecution. [20-1574] (GB) [Entered: 08/05/2020 02:58 PM]
July 2, 2020 NOTICE issued. After 07/16/2020, the following attorney will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless he registers for an appellate ECF account: Nicholas S. Guerrera for Access With Success Access With Success, Inc. and Dino N. Theodore. [20-1574] (GB) [Entered: 07/02/2020 07:41 AM]
July 1, 2020 DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Uber Technologies, Inc.. Certificate of service dated 07/01/2020. [20-1574] (GB) [Entered: 07/02/2020 07:23 AM]
July 1, 2020 TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Uber Technologies, Inc. indicating all necessary transcripts have already been filed in district court. Certificate of service dated 07/01/2020. [20-1574] (GB) [Entered: 07/02/2020 07:21 AM]
July 1, 2020 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Uber Technologies, Inc. filed by Attorney Bryan Killian. Certificate of service dated 07/01/2020. [20-1574] (BMK) [Entered: 07/01/2020 03:58 PM]
July 1, 2020 NOTICE of appearance filed by Attorney Stephanie Schuster for Appellant Uber Technologies, Inc. Certificate of service dated 07/01/2020. [20-1574] (GB) [Entered: 07/02/2020 07:15 AM]
June 16, 2020 CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #51) filed by Appellant Uber Technologies, Inc. Appearance form, Docketing Statement and Transcript Report/Order form due 07/01/2020 . [20-1574] (GB) [Entered: 06/17/2020 01:14 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Theodore, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Represented By: Stephanie Schuster
Represented By: Elizabeth G. Hays
Represented By: Anne Marie Estevez
Represented By: Bryan M. Killian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: ACCESS WITH SUCCESS ACCESS WITH SUCCESS, INC.
Represented By: Nicholas S. Guerrera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: DINO N. THEODORE, on behalf of himself and all persons similarly situated
Represented By: Nicholas S. Guerrera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?