Cronkite, et al v. Harrington
| WILLIAM K. HARRINGTON, U.S. Trustee |
| RAYMOND E. CRONKITE and DIANNE L'HEUREUX |
| 20-1634 |
| July 2, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellants Raymond E. Cronkite and Dianne L'Heureux. Brief and Appendix due 10/09/2020 for appellant Raymond E. Cronkite and Dianne L'Heureux. [20-1634] (ALW) [Entered: 08/27/2020 10:05 AM]
|
| MOTION to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellants Raymond E. Cronkite and Dianne L'Heureux. Certificate of service dated 08/25/2020. [20-1634] (ALW) [Entered: 08/26/2020 11:24 PM] |
| MOTION to dismiss William K. Harrington as party to the appeal and notice of non-participation filed by Appellee William K. Harrington. Certificate of service dated 07/22/2020. [20-1634] CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (EKB) [Entered: 07/22/2020 01:27 PM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 08/31/2020 for appellant Raymond E. Cronkite and Dianne L'Heureux. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. Please see the court's general order issued April 20, 2020, requiring the electronic filing of appendices. [20-1634] (ALW) [Entered: 07/20/2020 01:30 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #20) filed by Appellants Raymond E. Cronkite and Dianne L'Heureux. [20-1634]. (ALW) [Entered: 07/02/2020 06:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
