Saade v. Wilmington Trust, NA, et al
| FAY SERVICING, LLC, CHRISTIANA TRUST, WILMINGTON TRUST, NA, not in its individual capacity but solely in its capacity as trustee of MFRA Trust 2014-2 and PNMAC MORTGAGE CO. LLC |
| JACQUES SAADE |
| 20-1645 |
| July 7, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees Fay Servicing, LLC and Wilmington Trust, NA in 20-1646, 20-1645 filed by Attorney Christine M. Kingston. Certificate of service dated 09/02/2020. [20-1646, 20-1645] (CK) [Entered: 09/02/2020 04:50 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees Fay Servicing, LLC and Wilmington Trust, NA in 20-1646, 20-1645 filed by Attorney Kevin P. Polansky. Certificate of service dated 09/02/2020. [20-1646, 20-1645] (KPP) [Entered: 09/02/2020 04:43 PM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 10/13/2020 for appellant Jacques Saade. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. Please see the court's general order issued April 20, 2020, requiring the electronic filing of appendices. [20-1645, 20-1646] (AL) [Entered: 08/31/2020 10:55 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Jacques Saade in 20-1645, 20-1646 indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. Certificate of service was not included. [20-1645, 20-1646] (AL) [Entered: 08/31/2020 10:53 AM] |
ORDER entered: Appellant Jacques Saade filed a motion for an extension of time to file a transcript report/order form, but the motion does not state the grounds on which the request is based. See Fed. R. App. P. 27(a)(2)(A). The court does not grant extensions of time as a matter of course, but only for good cause shown. See Fed. R. App. P. 26(b). Notwithstanding this deficiency, the request for extension of time is granted. Appellant shall file his transcript report/order form on or before August 31, 2020 . The Clerk's Office expects that future motions will comply with Fed. R. App. P. 27. [20-1645, 20-1646] (GRC) [Entered: 08/27/2020 05:11 PM]
|
|
ORDER consolidating cases for purposes of briefing and oral argument. The following cases are consolidated: 20-1646 (Consolidated started 08/21/2020) with 20-1645. [20-1645, 20-1646] (MNH) [Entered: 08/21/2020 11:40 AM]
|
| LETTER sent to Appellant Jacques Saade in 20-1645, 20-1646 addressing his correspondence docketed August 18, 2020 enclosing copy of Transcript Report/Order Form. [20-1645, 20-1646] (AL) [Entered: 08/21/2020 11:39 AM] |
| MOTION to extend time to file a transcript report/order form filed by Appellant Jacques Saade in 20-1645, 20-1646. Certificate of service was not dated. [20-1645, 20-1646]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to attach a missing document. (AL) [Entered: 08/20/2020 04:23 PM] |
| LETTER filed by Appellant Jacques Saade informing the court Transcripts have been requested. Certificate of service was not included. [20-1645] (AL) [Entered: 08/19/2020 11:40 AM] |
| NOTICE of default and intent to dismiss issued. The appellant is directed to file a transcript report/order form or this case will be dismissed for lack of prosecution in accordance with 1st Cir. R. 3.0(b). Transcript report/order form due 08/19/2020. [20-1645] (AL) [Entered: 08/05/2020 02:03 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #79) filed by Appellant Jacques Saade. Transcript Report/Order form and Fee due 07/21/2020. [20-1645] (MNH) [Entered: 07/07/2020 12:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
