NLRB v. Bevilacqua Asphalt Corporation
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD |
BEVILACQUA ASPHALT CORPORATION |
20-1806 |
August 14, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Petitioner NLRB filed by Attorney David Habenstreit. Certificate of service dated 08/18/2020. [20-1806] (DH) [Entered: 08/18/2020 12:32 PM] |
AGENCY CASE docketed. Application for summary enforcement filed by Petitioner NLRB. Appearance form due 08/31/2020. Administrative record due 09/28/2020. Copy of petition served on respondents pursuant to FRAP 15(c). [20-1806] (RMK) [Entered: 08/17/2020 05:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: NLRB v. Bevilacqua Asphalt Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD | |
Represented By: | David Habenstreit |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: BEVILACQUA ASPHALT CORPORATION | |
Represented By: | James P. Allen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.