Robinson v. Barr
JERMAINE ST AUBYN ROBINSON |
WILLIAM P. BARR |
20-1807 |
August 17, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE of intent to remove petitioner filed by Respondent William P. Barr. Petitioner is scheduled for removal on or after 08/25/2020. Certificate of service dated 08/18/2020. [20-1807] (GAP) [Entered: 08/18/2020 02:37 PM] |
MOTION to dismiss case and RESPONSE to motion to stay removal [ # 6360598-2 ] filed by Respondent William P. Barr. Certificate of service dated 08/18/2020. [20-1807] (GAP) [Entered: 08/18/2020 02:40 PM] |
MOTION for Attorney Derek Julius and Anthony Nicastro to withdraw as counsel filed by Respondent William P. Barr. Certificate of service dated 08/18/2020. [20-1807] (GAP) [Entered: 08/18/2020 02:44 PM] |
![]() |
![]() |
MOTION for an emergency stay of removal filed by Petitioner Jermaine St Aubyn Robinson. Certificate of service dated 08/16/2020. [20-1807] (ALW) [Entered: 08/17/2020 11:54 AM] |
NOTICE regarding application of Local Rule 18.0. [20-1807] (ALW) [Entered: 08/17/2020 11:56 AM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Respondent William P. Barr filed by Attorney Gregory Pennington. Certificate of service dated 08/17/2020. [20-1807] (GAP) [Entered: 08/17/2020 12:30 PM] |
AGENCY CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioner Jermaine St Aubyn Robinson. Fee and Appearance form due 08/31/2020. Administrative record due 09/28/2020. Copy of petition served on respondent(s) pursuant to FRAP 15(c). [20-1807] (ALW) [Entered: 08/17/2020 11:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.