Sosa v. Saul
| JUAN SOSA |
| ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 20-1837 |
| September 6, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE issued. [20-1837] (GB) [Entered: 10/27/2020 06:35 AM] |
| JUDGMENT entered: Upon consideration of appellant's unopposed motion, it is hereby ordered that this appeal be voluntarily dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). Mandate to issue forthwith. [20-1837] (GB) [Entered: 10/27/2020 06:34 AM] |
ORDER entered: Upon consideration, appellant Andrew M. Saul's motion to consolidate Appeal Nos. 20-1780 and 20-1837 is denied as moot in light of appellant's motion to voluntarily dismiss Appeal No. 20-1837 and the judgment entered therein on October 27, 2020. [20-1780, 20-1837] (GB) [Entered: 10/27/2020 10:40 AM]
|
| ASSENTED TO MOTION to dismiss case filed by Appellant Andrew M. Saul. Certificate of service dated 10/09/2020. [20-1837] (JMS) [Entered: 10/09/2020 01:57 PM] |
| NOTICE issued. The following attorney has failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: Elizabeth A. Valentine for Juan Sosa. [20-1837] (GB) [Entered: 10/07/2020 05:58 AM] |
|
ORDER to Show Cause entered. It is hereby ordered that appellant either move for voluntary dismissal under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) or show cause, in writing, why this appeal should not be dismissed. The failure to take either action by October 13, 2020 may lead to dismissal of the appeal for lack of diligent prosecution. [20-1837] (GB) [Entered: 09/29/2020 02:37 PM]
|
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Andrew M. Saul. Certificate of service dated 09/24/2020. [20-1837] (JMS) [Entered: 09/24/2020 05:32 PM] |
| NOTICE issued. After 10/06/2020, the following attorney will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless she registers for an appellate ECF account: Elizabeth A. Valentine for Juan Sosa. [20-1837] (GB) [Entered: 09/22/2020 08:56 AM] |
| NOTICE of default and intent to dismiss issued. The appellant is directed to file a docketing statement or this case will be dismissed for lack of prosecution in accordance with 1st Cir. R. 3.0(b). Docketing Statement due 10/06/2020 . [20-1837] (GB) [Entered: 09/22/2020 08:53 AM] |
| ASSENTED TO MOTION to consolidate cases filed by Appellant Andrew M. Saul in 20-1837, 20-1780. Certificate of service dated 09/15/2020. [20-1837, 20-1780] (PN) [Entered: 09/15/2020 04:50 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Andrew M. Saul filed by Attorney Joshua M. Salzman. Certificate of service dated 09/10/2020. [20-1837] (JMS) [Entered: 09/10/2020 01:53 PM] |
| Public docket note: Andrew M. Saul was sworn in as Commissioner of Social Security on June 17, 2019. We have substituted him for Acting Commissioner, Nancy Berryhill, as the appellee. See Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2). [20-1837] (GB) [Entered: 09/06/2020 06:52 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #52) filed by Appellant Andrew M. Saul. Appearance form and Docketing Statement due 09/21/2020 . [20-1837] (GB) [Entered: 09/06/2020 06:45 AM] |
| Public docket note: Andrew M. Saul was sworn in as Commissioner of Social Security on June 17, 2019. We have substituted him for Acting Commissioner, Nancy Berryhill, as the appellee. See Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2). [20-1837] (GB) [Entered: 09/06/2020 06:52 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #52) filed by Appellant Andrew M. Saul. Appearance form and Docketing Statement due 09/21/2020 . [20-1837] (GB) [Entered: 09/06/2020 06:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
