Lu v. Stanton, et al
JOSEPH STANTON, WALTER F. TIMILITY, LENA M. WONG, PAUL TUTTLE, MASSACHUSETTS APPEALS COURT, C. JEFFREY KINDER, ANN THOMAS, MARK GREEN, JULIE B. GOLDMAN, PATRICIA RYLE, FOR THE RECORD, INC. and NANCY MARTINS |
FRIEDRICH LU |
20-1843 |
September 8, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MOTION for Summary Reversal in Lieu of Opening Brief filed by Appellant Friedrich Lu. Certificate of service was not included. [20-1843] (GB) [Entered: 10/30/2020 10:41 AM] |
NOTICE issued. The following attorney has failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: Monika Zarski for For The Record, Inc.. [20-1843] (GB) [Entered: 10/08/2020 05:43 AM] |
NOTICE issued. After 10/07/2020, the following attorney will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless she registers for an appellate ECF account: Monika Zarski for For The Record, Inc. [20-1843] (GB) [Entered: 09/23/2020 06:27 AM] |
BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 10/26/2020 for appellant Friedrich Lu. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. Please see the court's general order issued April 20, 2020, requiring the electronic filing of appendices. [20-1843] (GB) [Entered: 09/15/2020 01:36 PM] |
CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #32) filed by Appellant Friedrich Lu. [20-1843]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (GB) [Entered: 09/08/2020 11:13 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.