Kersey v. Avery Dennison Corporation
| AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION |
| GEORGE E. KERSEY |
| 20-1872 |
| September 17, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE of default and intent to dismiss issued directing appellant to file an appendix or this case will be dismissed for lack of prosecution in accordance with 1st Cir. R. 45.0(a). Appendix due November 27, 2020. [20-1872] (AL) [Entered: 11/13/2020 02:47 PM] |
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF and request for default judgment filed by Appellant George E. Kersey. Certificate of Service note dated. Num. Copies 4. [20-1872] (AL) [Entered: 11/12/2020 05:08 PM] |
ORDER entered by Jeffrey R. Howard, Chief Appellate Judge: Plaintiff-appellant's motion for reconsideration of the October 9, 2020 order denying without prejudice the request to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is denied. [20-1872] (AL) [Entered: 11/04/2020 11:11 AM]
|
| MOTION to reconsider order [ # 6373750-2 ] filed by Appellant George E. Kersey. Certificate of service was not included. [20-1872] (AL) [Entered: 10/19/2020 11:01 AM] |
|
ORDER entered. Appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied without prejudice to filing a compliant motion and financial affidavit with this court. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). A compliant request for in forma pauperis status consists of a motion and a fully completed Form 4, financial affidavit. A copy of Form 4 is enclosed to the appellant with this order. Unless appellant provides this court with proof of paying the $505 filing fee to the district court or filing a compliant request for in forma pauperis status with this court by October 23, 2020, this appeal may be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Loc. R. 3.0(b). [20-1872] (GAK) [Entered: 10/09/2020 03:15 PM]
|
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 11/09/2020 for appellant George E. Kersey. [20-1872] (GB) [Entered: 09/30/2020 12:39 PM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed pro se by Appellant George E. Kersey. Certificate of service was not included. [20-1872] (RMK) [Entered: 10/02/2020 01:24 PM] |
| MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed pro se by Appellant George E. Kersey. Certificate of service was not included. [20-1872]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (RMK) [Entered: 10/02/2020 03:29 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed pro se by Appellant George E. Kersey indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. Certificate of service was not included. [20-1872] (RMK) [Entered: 09/28/2020 02:52 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #7) filed by Appellant George E. Kersey. Docketing Statement due 10/01/2020. Fee due 10/01/2020. [20-1872] (RMK) [Entered: 09/17/2020 01:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Kersey v. Avery Dennison Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: GEORGE E. KERSEY | |
| Represented By: | George E. Kersey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
