Ash-Shaheed v. Vaintrub, et al
| IRINA VAINTRUB, DUFFY & PARTNERS and KENNETH F. FULGINITI |
| SALAHUDIN ASH-SHAHEED |
| 20-1882 |
| September 13, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| LETTER sent to Appellant Salahudin Ash-Shaheed, acknowledging receipt on November 3, 2020, of a recent correspondence dated September 29, 2020. [20-1882] (GB) [Entered: 11/10/2020 12:06 PM] |
ORDER entered: Upon consideration of motion, it is ordered that the time for plaintiff-appellant Salahudin Ash-Shaheed to file a PLRA Forms 1 and 2 be enlarged to and including November 23, 2020 . [20-1882] (KPC) [Entered: 11/06/2020 03:16 PM]
|
| MOTION to extend time to file PLRA forms and RESPONSE to PLRA letter issued on September 18, 2020 [ # 6368171-2 ] filed by Appellant Salahudin Ash-Shaheed. Certificate of service dated 09/29/2020. [20-1882] (GB) [Entered: 11/04/2020 06:12 AM] |
|
ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief filed by Appellant Salahudin Ash-Shaheed. Brief due 12/09/2020 for appellant Salahudin Ash-Shaheed. [20-1882] (GB) [Entered: 11/02/2020 12:49 PM]
|
| NOTICE of default and intent to dismiss issued. This appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 3(a) and 1st Cir. R. 45.0 for failure to prosecute unless the required PLRA forms are properly completed and filed with this office or the full filing fee is paid to the clerk of the district court by 11/13/2020. [20-1882] (KPC) [Entered: 10/30/2020 11:39 AM] |
| MOTION to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Appellant Salahudin Ash-Shaheed. Certificate of service was not included. [20-1882] (GB) [Entered: 11/02/2020 12:45 PM] |
|
ORDER entered: Upon consideration of motion, and upon review of the record in this case, plaintiff-appellant Salahudin Ash-Shaheed's motion to amend the case caption is allowed. The following revised caption must be used on all papers filed in this case. [20-1882] (GB) [Entered: 09/29/2020 11:41 AM]
|
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 11/09/2020 for appellant Salahudin Ash-Shaheed. [20-1882] (GB) [Entered: 09/28/2020 02:21 PM] |
| Judicial Notice of Correct Case Caption filed by Appellant Salahudin Ash-Shaheed. Certificate of service was not included. [20-1882] (GB) [Entered: 09/25/2020 04:01 PM] |
|
ORDER entered by Rogeriee Thompson, Appellate Judge: Plaintiff has filed a motion for appointment of counsel. Upon consideration, we conclude that appointment is not warranted in this case. The motion is denied. [20-1882] (GB) [Entered: 09/24/2020 08:17 AM]
|
| MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Salahudin Ash-Shaheed. Certificate of service dated 09/21/2020. [20-1882] (GB) [Entered: 09/21/2020 01:43 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure filed by Appellant Salahudin Ash-Shaheed. Certificate of service was not included. [20-1882] (GB) [Entered: 09/21/2020 01:46 PM] |
| Judicial Notice of filing exhibits filed by Appellant Salahudin Ash-Shaheed. Certificate of service dated 09/17/2020. [20-1882] (GB) [Entered: 09/21/2020 01:50 PM] |
| PLRA LETTER issued. IFP was granted in district court. PLRA forms sent. PLRA response due 10/02/2020 . [20-1882] (GB) [Entered: 09/18/2020 12:27 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #14) filed by Appellant Salahudin Ash-Shaheed. Fee due 09/28/2020 . [20-1882] (GB) [Entered: 09/13/2020 06:51 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #14) filed by Appellant Salahudin Ash-Shaheed. Fee due 09/28/2020 . [20-1882] (GB) [Entered: 09/13/2020 06:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
