Pace v. Mass. DOC, et al
| STEVEN SILVA, Former Superintendant of The Souza Baranowski Correctional Facility, In His Official and Individual Capacities, THOMAS A. TURCO, III, Former Commissioner of The Department of Correction, In His Official and Individual Capacities, STEVEN KENNEWAY, Superintendant of The Souza Baranowski Correctional Facility, In His Official and Individual Capacities, CAROL A. MICI, Commissioner of The Department of Correction, In Her Official and Individual Capacities, STEVEN KENNEWAY, Superintendent of The Souza Baranowski Correctional Facility, in his official and individual capacities, STEVEN SILVA, Former Superintendent of The Souza Baranowski Correctional Facility, in his official and individual capacities and CAROL A. MICI, Commissioner of The Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities |
| JASON J. CHAPUT, CHRISTOPHER J. MASCHARKA, JUSTIN SALAMONE, DAVID BOLDUC, MATTHEW H. VALADE, ROBERT M. DUVAL, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, DAVID BOLDUC, Correctional Officer, JUSTIN SALAMONE, Correctional Officer, CHRISTOPHER J. MASCHARKA, Correctional Officer, MATTHEW H. VALADE, Correctional Officer, JASON J. CHAPUT, Correctional Officer and ROBERT M. DUVAL, Correctional Officer |
| ANDRE PACE |
| 20-1909 |
| October 5, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGMENT dismissing case pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). [20-1909] (GRC) [Entered: 11/24/2020 02:53 PM] |
| MANDATE issued. [20-1909] (GRC) [Entered: 11/24/2020 02:58 PM] |
| LETTER sent to Appellant Andre Pace regarding status of appeal. [20-1909] (GRC) [Entered: 11/19/2020 05:15 PM] |
| DOCKET sheet sent to appellant. [20-1909] (GRC) [Entered: 11/19/2020 05:17 PM] |
| LETTER sent to Appellant Andre Pace regarding status of appeal. [20-1909] (GRC) [Entered: 11/18/2020 04:58 PM] |
| MOTION to dismiss case filed by Appellant Andre Pace. Certificate of service dated 11/07/2020. [20-1909] (GRC) [Entered: 11/12/2020 04:20 PM] |
| LETTER filed by Appellant Andre Pace requesting status of appeal and motion for appointment of counsel. [20-1909] (GRC) [Entered: 11/09/2020 04:57 PM] |
ORDER to Show Cause entered directing appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Show cause response due 11/19/2020. [20-1909] (GRC) [Entered: 11/05/2020 09:57 AM]
|
|
ORDER entered by Jeffrey R. Howard, Chief Appellate Judge: Plaintiff-appellant's motion for appointment of counsel is denied. [20-1909] (GRC) [Entered: 11/04/2020 04:30 PM]
|
| PLRA LETTER issued. IFP was granted in district court. PLRA forms sent. PLRA response due 11/18/2020. [20-1909] (GRC) [Entered: 11/04/2020 04:17 PM] |
| LETTER providing cover page to motion for appointment of counsel Appellant Andre Pace. Certificate of service was not included. [20-1909] (KPC) [Entered: 10/16/2020 05:14 PM] |
| LETTER filed by Appellant Andre Pace requesting documents. Certificate of service dated 10/01/2020. [20-1909] (GRC) [Entered: 10/15/2020 12:43 PM] |
| MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Andre Pace. Certificate of service was not included. [20-1909] (GRC) [Entered: 10/15/2020 01:48 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees David Bolduc, Jason J. Chaput, DOC, Robert M. Duval, Christopher J. Mascharka, Justin Salamone and Matthew H. Valade filed by Attorney Veronica Elizabeth DeDosantos. Certificate of service dated 10/07/2020. [20-1909] (VED) [Entered: 10/07/2020 08:08 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #109) filed by Appellant Andre Pace. Fee due 10/19/2020. [20-1909] (MNH) [Entered: 10/05/2020 04:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
