Verogna v. Twitter, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee: TWITTER INC. and TWITTER, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant: SENSA VEROGNA, individual
Interested Party: UNITED STATES
Case Number: 20-1933
Filed: September 25, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2020 RESPONSE filed by Appellee Twitter, Inc. to motion to consolidate cases [ # 6383076-2 ]. Certificate of service dated 11/23/2020. [20-1933] (JES) [Entered: 11/23/2020 02:11 PM]
November 19, 2020 MOTION and memorandum to consolidate cases filed by Appellant Sensa Verogna. Certificate of service dated 11/12/2020. [20-1933, 20-2005, 20-2006] (GAK) [Entered: 11/19/2020 05:07 PM]
November 19, 2020 NOTICE issued. After 12/03/2020, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Indraneel Sur for US in 20-1933, 20-2005, 20-2006. [20-1933, 20-2005, 20-2006] (GAK) [Entered: 11/19/2020 11:36 AM]
October 30, 2020 REPLY filed by Appellant Sensa Verogna to motion to consolidate cases [ # 6374936-2 ]. Certificate of service dated 10/30/2020. [20-1933] (GAK) [Entered: 11/02/2020 03:23 PM]
October 29, 2020 NOTICE issued. After 11/12/2020, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Indraneel Sur for US. [20-1933] (GAK) [Entered: 10/29/2020 12:44 PM]
October 23, 2020 RESPONSE filed by Appellee Twitter Inc. to motion [ # 6374936-2 ]. Certificate of service dated 10/23/2020. [20-1933] (JES) [Entered: 10/23/2020 08:02 PM]
October 22, 2020 NOTICE issued. After 11/05/2020, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Jonathan Eck for Twitter Inc.. [20-1933] (GAK) [Entered: 10/22/2020 11:25 AM]
October 16, 2020 MOTION to join or consolidate related appeals filed by Appellant Sensa Verogna. Certificate of service dated 10/13/2020. [20-1933] (GAK) [Entered: 10/16/2020 12:22 PM]
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER entered by Juan R. Torruella, Appellate Judge; Sandra L. Lynch, Appellate Judge and Rogeriee Thompson, Appellate Judge. In light of the district court's September 28, 2020, order staying further action pending resolution of plaintiff's appeal, plaintiff's Emergency Motion to Stay Compulsion of True Identity is denied as moot. [20-1933] (GAK) [Entered: 10/16/2020 10:24 AM]
October 9, 2020 MOTION to Suspend Rule or to File True Identity Under Seal filed by Appellant Sensa Verogna. Certificate of service dated 10/09/2020. [20-1933] (GAK) [Entered: 10/09/2020 03:28 PM]
October 9, 2020 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Twitter Inc. filed by Attorney Julie E. Schwartz. Certificate of service dated 10/09/2020. [20-1933] (JES) [Entered: 10/09/2020 02:21 PM]
October 7, 2020 Filing fee was paid in the district court by Appellant Sensa Verogna on 10/06/2020. [20-1933] (GAK) [Entered: 10/07/2020 10:40 AM]
September 28, 2020 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Twitter Inc. filed by Attorney David A. Perez. Certificate of service dated 09/28/2020. [20-1933] (DAP) [Entered: 09/28/2020 11:58 AM]
September 28, 2020 RESPONSE filed by Appellee Twitter Inc. to Emergency MOTION to Stay Complusion of True Identity [ # 6370168-2 ]. Certificate of service dated 09/28/2020. [20-1933] (GAK) [Entered: 09/28/2020 12:18 PM]
September 28, 2020 DISCLOSURE statement filed by Appellee Twitter Inc.. Certificate of service dated 09/28/2020. [20-1933] (GAK) [Entered: 09/28/2020 12:18 PM]
September 25, 2020 Emergency MOTION to Stay Complusion of True Identity filed by Appellant Sensa Verogna. Certificate of service dated 09/25/2020. [20-1933] (GAK) [Entered: 09/25/2020 05:37 PM]
September 25, 2020 CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #57) filed by Appellant Sensa Verogna. Fee due 10/09/2020. [20-1933] (GAK) [Entered: 09/25/2020 05:26 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Verogna v. Twitter, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TWITTER INC.
Represented By: Jonathan Eck
Represented By: Julie E. Schwartz
Represented By: David A. Perez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TWITTER, INC.
Represented By: Julie E. Schwartz
Represented By: David A. Perez
Represented By: Jonathan Mark Eck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: SENSA VEROGNA, individual
Represented By: Sensa Verogna
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: UNITED STATES
Represented By: Indraneel Sur
Represented By: Seth R. Aframe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?