Verogna v. Twitter, Inc.
TWITTER INC. and TWITTER, INC. |
SENSA VEROGNA, individual |
UNITED STATES |
20-1933 |
September 25, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
RESPONSE filed by Appellee Twitter, Inc. to motion to consolidate cases [ # 6383076-2 ]. Certificate of service dated 11/23/2020. [20-1933] (JES) [Entered: 11/23/2020 02:11 PM] |
MOTION and memorandum to consolidate cases filed by Appellant Sensa Verogna. Certificate of service dated 11/12/2020. [20-1933, 20-2005, 20-2006] (GAK) [Entered: 11/19/2020 05:07 PM] |
NOTICE issued. After 12/03/2020, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Indraneel Sur for US in 20-1933, 20-2005, 20-2006. [20-1933, 20-2005, 20-2006] (GAK) [Entered: 11/19/2020 11:36 AM] |
REPLY filed by Appellant Sensa Verogna to motion to consolidate cases [ # 6374936-2 ]. Certificate of service dated 10/30/2020. [20-1933] (GAK) [Entered: 11/02/2020 03:23 PM] |
NOTICE issued. After 11/12/2020, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Indraneel Sur for US. [20-1933] (GAK) [Entered: 10/29/2020 12:44 PM] |
RESPONSE filed by Appellee Twitter Inc. to motion [ # 6374936-2 ]. Certificate of service dated 10/23/2020. [20-1933] (JES) [Entered: 10/23/2020 08:02 PM] |
NOTICE issued. After 11/05/2020, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Jonathan Eck for Twitter Inc.. [20-1933] (GAK) [Entered: 10/22/2020 11:25 AM] |
MOTION to join or consolidate related appeals filed by Appellant Sensa Verogna. Certificate of service dated 10/13/2020. [20-1933] (GAK) [Entered: 10/16/2020 12:22 PM] |
ORDER entered by Juan R. Torruella, Appellate Judge; Sandra L. Lynch, Appellate Judge and Rogeriee Thompson, Appellate Judge. In light of the district court's September 28, 2020, order staying further action pending resolution of plaintiff's appeal, plaintiff's Emergency Motion to Stay Compulsion of True Identity is denied as moot. [20-1933] (GAK) [Entered: 10/16/2020 10:24 AM] |
MOTION to Suspend Rule or to File True Identity Under Seal filed by Appellant Sensa Verogna. Certificate of service dated 10/09/2020. [20-1933] (GAK) [Entered: 10/09/2020 03:28 PM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Twitter Inc. filed by Attorney Julie E. Schwartz. Certificate of service dated 10/09/2020. [20-1933] (JES) [Entered: 10/09/2020 02:21 PM] |
Filing fee was paid in the district court by Appellant Sensa Verogna on 10/06/2020. [20-1933] (GAK) [Entered: 10/07/2020 10:40 AM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Twitter Inc. filed by Attorney David A. Perez. Certificate of service dated 09/28/2020. [20-1933] (DAP) [Entered: 09/28/2020 11:58 AM] |
RESPONSE filed by Appellee Twitter Inc. to Emergency MOTION to Stay Complusion of True Identity [ # 6370168-2 ]. Certificate of service dated 09/28/2020. [20-1933] (GAK) [Entered: 09/28/2020 12:18 PM] |
DISCLOSURE statement filed by Appellee Twitter Inc.. Certificate of service dated 09/28/2020. [20-1933] (GAK) [Entered: 09/28/2020 12:18 PM] |
Emergency MOTION to Stay Complusion of True Identity filed by Appellant Sensa Verogna. Certificate of service dated 09/25/2020. [20-1933] (GAK) [Entered: 09/25/2020 05:37 PM] |
CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #57) filed by Appellant Sensa Verogna. Fee due 10/09/2020. [20-1933] (GAK) [Entered: 09/25/2020 05:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.