SEC v. Chan
Defendant / Appellant: SCHULTZ CHAN, a/k/a Jason Chan
Plaintiff / Appellee: US SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Case Number: 20-1985
Filed: November 2, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER granting motion to extend time to file opening forms filed by Appellant Schultz Chan. Appearance form due 01/25/2021. Docketing Statement due 01/25/2021. [20-1985] (CMP) [Entered: 12/29/2020 05:09 PM]
December 24, 2020 MOTION to extend time to file an appearance form and docketing statement filed by Appellant Schultz Chan. Certificate of service dated 12/24/2020. [20-1985] (PCH) [Entered: 12/24/2020 02:33 PM]
December 23, 2020 NOTICE issued. The following attorneys have failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: Lee A. Greenwood for US Securities & Exchange Commission, Charles D. Riely for US Securities & Exchange Commission and Simona Suh for US Securities & Exchange Commission. [20-1985] (GB) [Entered: 12/23/2020 09:38 AM]
December 10, 2020 NOTICE of default and intent to dismiss issued. The appellant is directed to file an appearance form and docketing statement or this case will be dismissed for lack of prosecution in accordance with 1st Cir. R. 3.0(b). Appearance form and Docketing Statement due 12/24/2020. [20-1985] (KPC) [Entered: 12/10/2020 03:43 PM]
December 8, 2020 NOTICE issued. After 12/22/2020, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Lee A. Greenwood for US Securities & Exchange Commission, Charles D. Riely for US Securities & Exchange Commission and Simona Suh for US Securities & Exchange Commission. [20-1985] (KPC) [Entered: 12/08/2020 01:03 PM]
November 3, 2020 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee US Securities & Exchange Commission filed by Attorney John Boles Capehart. Certificate of service dated 11/03/2020. [20-1985] (JBC) [Entered: 11/03/2020 10:54 AM]
November 2, 2020 CASE transferred from the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. [20-1985] (MNH) [Entered: 11/02/2020 05:42 PM]
November 2, 2020 CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #45) filed by Appellant Schultz Chan. Docketing Statement and Appearance form due 11/16/2020. [20-1985] (MNH) [Entered: 11/02/2020 05:30 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: SEC v. Chan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: SCHULTZ CHAN, a/k/a Jason Chan
Represented By: Schultz Chan
Represented By: Peter Charles Horstmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: US SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Represented By: Martin F. Healey
Represented By: Charles D. Riely
Represented By: Simona Suh
Represented By: John Boles Capehart
Represented By: Lee A. Greenwood
Represented By: Donald Campbell Lockhart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?