Rios-Rodriguez v. PR Dept. of Justice, et al
| INES DEL C. CARRAU-MARTINEZ, Secretary of Justice and PR DEPT OF JUSTICE |
| LUIS ALBERTO RIOS-RODRIGUEZ |
| 20-2072 |
| November 20, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE issued. The following attorney has failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: Ines del C. Carrau-Martinez for PR Dept of Justice and Ines del C. Carrau-Martinez. [20-2072] (GB) [Entered: 12/29/2020 03:41 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees PR Dept of Justice and Ines del C. Carrau-Martinez filed by Attorney Carlos Lugo-Fiol. Certificate of service dated 12/24/2020. [20-2072] (CL) [Entered: 12/24/2020 01:42 PM] |
| NOTICE issued. After 12/28/2020, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Ines del C. Carrau-Martinez for PR Dept of Justice and Ines del C. Carrau-Martinez. [20-2072] (KPC) [Entered: 12/11/2020 11:49 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTAL record filed consisting of district court docket entry no. 11 (Order noting supplemental motion for IFP filed). [20-2072] (CMP) [Entered: 12/10/2020 01:26 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTAL record consisting of district docket entry no. 8 (order granting motion to appeal IFP). [20-2072] (CMP) [Entered: 12/02/2020 10:28 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #5) filed by Appellant Luis Alberto Rios-Rodriguez. [20-2072] (MNH) [Entered: 11/20/2020 12:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
