Graham v. State of Maine
| MARK GRAHAM |
| STATE OF MAINE |
| 20-8020 |
| September 29, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Request to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Mark Graham is pending in the Court of Appeals. [20-8020] (GAK) [Entered: 10/01/2020 01:27 PM] |
| MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Mark Graham. Certificate of service dated 09/21/2020. [20-8020] (ALW) [Entered: 10/01/2020 12:27 PM] |
| MISCELLANEOUS CASE docketed. Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner Mark Graham. [20-8020]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (ALW) [Entered: 10/01/2020 12:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Graham v. State of Maine | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: STATE OF MAINE | |
| Represented By: | Aaron M. Frey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: MARK GRAHAM | |
| Represented By: | Mark Graham |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
