Monsarrat v. Newman
| RON NEWMAN |
| JONATHAN MONSARRAT |
| 21-1146 |
| March 10, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant Jonathan Monsarrat. Brief and Appendix due June 18, 2021 for appellant Jonathan Monsarrat. [21-1146] (AL) [Entered: 05/03/2021 11:12 AM]
|
| JOINT MOTION to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant Jonathan Monsarrat and Appellee Ron Newman. Certificate of service dated 04/30/2021. [21-1146] (RAG) [Entered: 04/30/2021 03:29 PM] |
|
ORDER entered: Appellant Jonathan Monsarrat and Appellee Ron Newman's March 30, 2021 joint motion to modify the briefing schedule is granted in part . Appellant Jonathan Monsarrat's brief and appendix are to be filed on, or before, May 20, 2021 . To the extent the motion which seeks to extend the deadline for filing appellee's brief and appellant's reply brief, the motion is denied without prejudice as premature. See Fed. R. App. P. 31(a)(1) and 1st Cir. 31.0(a)(1). [21-1146] (AL) [Entered: 04/01/2021 04:51 PM]
|
| JOINT MOTION to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant Jonathan Monsarrat and Appellee Ron Newman. Certificate of service dated 03/30/2021. [21-1146] (RAG) [Entered: 03/30/2021 04:02 PM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 05/03/2021 for appellant Jonathan Monsarrat. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. Please see the court's general order issued April 20, 2020, requiring the electronic filing of appendices. [21-1146] (AL) [Entered: 03/23/2021 04:10 PM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Jonathan Monsarrat. Certificate of service dated 03/23/2021. [21-1146] CLERK'S NOTE: Additional attachment must be filed separately. Correction made by clerk's office. No further action required. (RAG) [Entered: 03/23/2021 10:18 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Ron Newman filed by Attorney Daniel G. Booth. Certificate of service dated 03/23/2021. [21-1146] (DGB) [Entered: 03/23/2021 10:48 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance filed by Attorney Ryan D. Sullivan for Appellant Jonathan Monsarrat. Certificate of service dated 03/23/2021. [21-1146] (AL) [Entered: 03/23/2021 04:02 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #37) filed by Appellant Jonathan Monsarrat. Docketing Statement and Appearance form due 03/24/2021. [21-1146] (MNH) [Entered: 03/10/2021 10:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Monsarrat v. Newman | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: RON NEWMAN | |
| Represented By: | Daniel G. Booth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: JONATHAN MONSARRAT | |
| Represented By: | Ryan D. Sullivan |
| Represented By: | Richard A. Goren |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
