Lu v. Davis, et al
JOSEPH SULLIVAN, DOMINIC BLUE, STEVE POFTAK, ANDERSON & KREIGER LLP, STEPHANIE POLLACK, RALPH D. GANTS, BRIAN LANG, SONYA SKINNER, MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, DEAN MAZZARELLA, GREGG TAYLOR, REPRESENTATIVES AT CHARLIECARD SUPPORT SERVICES, CHRISTINA S. MARSHALL, IRWIN DRIGGS, LUIS MANUEL RAMIREZ, RUTH BONSIGNORE, FRANK DEPAOLA, SARAH ST. PIERRE, KEVIN DAVIS, PAULA M. CAREY, BETSY TAYLOR, ABM JANITORIAL SERVICES NORTHEAST, INC., NINA L. PICKERING-COOK, DAVID S. MACKEY, TYLER OSTHOLTHOFF, MARK GREEN and MASSACHUSETTS STATE COURTS |
FRIEDRICH LU |
ABM INDUSTRY GROUPS, LLC |
21-1306 |
April 21, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MOTION to Substitute Chief Justice of Supreme Judicial Court pursuant to FRAP 43 filed by Appellant Friedrich Lu. Certificate of service was not included. [21-1306] (GB) [Entered: 06/08/2021 08:40 AM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees Ralph D. Gants, Paula M. Carey and Mark Green filed by Attorney Phoebe Fischer-Groban. Certificate of service dated 06/02/2021. [21-1306] CLERK'S NOTE: The signature on the document does not match the name of the ECF filer under whose login and password the document was filed. THE FILER IS DIRECTED TO RE-FILE THE DOCUMENT WITHIN TWO DAYS, BY 06/04/2021. (AKS) [Entered: 06/02/2021 10:05 AM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees Paula M. Carey, Ralph D. Gants and Mark Green filed by Attorney Phoebe Fischer-Groban. Certificate of service dated 06/02/2021. [21-1306] (PF) [Entered: 06/02/2021 03:44 PM] |
PLEADING tendered: Appellant's Brief filed by Appellant Friedrich Lu. Number of copies: 5. Certificate of service dated 05/19/2021. [21-1306] (AVN) [Entered: 05/24/2021 12:05 PM] |
NOTICE issued. The following attorneys have failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: Nina L. Pickering-Cook for Nina L. Pickering-Cook and Richard S. Weitzel for Massachusetts State Courts. [21-1306] (GB) [Entered: 05/24/2021 06:15 AM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees Anderson & Kreiger LLP, David S. Mackey, Christina S. Marshall and Nina L. Pickering-Cook filed by Attorney Ezra D. Dunkle-Polier. Certificate of service dated 05/24/2021. [21-1306] (EDD) [Entered: 05/24/2021 03:39 PM] |
NOTICE issued. After 05/21/2021, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Phoebe Fischer-Groban for Mark Green, Ralph D. Gants, Paula M. Carey and Massachusetts State Courts, Nina L. Pickering-Cook for Nina L. Pickering-Cook and Richard S. Weitzel for Massachusetts State Courts. [21-1306] (GB) [Entered: 05/07/2021 06:26 AM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee ABM Janitorial Services Northeast, Inc. filed by Attorney William P. McGovern, Jr.. Certificate of service dated 05/06/2021. [21-1306] (WPM) [Entered: 05/06/2021 02:36 PM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees Kevin Davis, Frank DePaola, Irwin Driggs, MBTA, Tyler Ostholthoff, Steve Poftak, Luis Manuel Ramirez, Representatives at CharlieCard Support Services, Sarah St. Pierre and Sonya Skinner filed by Attorney Amy Bratskeir. Certificate of service dated 05/04/2021. [21-1306] (ABB) [Entered: 05/04/2021 02:30 PM] |
Filing fee was paid in the district court by Appellant Friedrich Lu on 04/29/2021. [21-1306] (GB) [Entered: 04/30/2021 10:00 AM] |
CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #100) filed by Appellant Friedrich Lu. Fee due 05/06/2021 . [21-1306] (GB) [Entered: 04/22/2021 09:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.