Seifer v. Government Employees Insurance Company
| GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY |
| ANITA SEIFER |
| 21-1371 |
| May 11, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Seifer v. Government Employees Insurance Company |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant Anita Seifer. Brief and Appendix due 07/12/2021 for appellant Anita Seifer. [21-1371] (ALW) [Entered: 06/21/2021 12:40 PM]
|
| MOTION to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant Anita Seifer. Certificate of service dated 06/20/2021. [21-1371] (MEO) [Entered: 06/20/2021 07:58 PM] |
| SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. Docket entries: 29 - Electronic Order entered on 6/8/2021 granting in forma pauperis status while on appeal. [21-1371] (DO) [Entered: 06/10/2021 10:38 AM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Anita Seifer. Certificate of service dated 05/22/2021. [21-1371] (MEO) [Entered: 05/22/2021 03:18 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Anita Seifer filed by Attorney Mark Ellis O'Brien. Certificate of service dated 05/22/2021. [21-1371] (MEO) [Entered: 05/22/2021 01:55 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Government Employees Insurance Company filed by Attorney Michael D Schollard. Certificate of service dated 05/20/2021. [21-1371] (MDS) [Entered: 05/20/2021 02:55 PM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 06/28/2021 for appellant Anita Seifer. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. Please see the court's general order issued April 20, 2020, requiring the electronic filing of appendices. [21-1371]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (ALW) [Entered: 05/15/2021 03:08 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Government Employees Insurance Company filed by Attorney Michael Schollard. Certificate of service dated 05/17/2021. [21-1371] CLERK'S NOTE: The signature on the document does not match the name of the ECF filer under whose login and password the document was filed. THE FILER IS DIRECTED TO RE-FILE THE DOCUMENT WITHIN TWO DAYS (05//20/2021). (REH) [Entered: 05/17/2021 08:04 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #25 ) filed by Appellant Anita Seifer. Docketing Statement and Appearance form due 05/25/2021. [21-1371] (ALW) [Entered: 05/11/2021 10:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Seifer v. Government Employees Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Michael D. Schollard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: ANITA SEIFER | |
| Represented By: | Mark Ellis O'Brien |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
