Paiva v. Grande, et al
RICHARD LEE PAIVA |
KAREN GRANDE, individually and in her official capacity as a doctor at RIDOC, PAULINE MARCUSSEN, individually and in her official capacity as a doctor at RIDOC and JUSTIN BERK, individually and in his official capacity as a doctor at RIDOC |
21-1504 |
July 9, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
APPELLANT'S BRIEF filed by Appellant Richard Lee Paiva. Number of copies: 4. Certificate of service dated 08/13/2021. Brief due 09/20/2021 for APPELLEES Justin Berk, Karen Grande and Pauline Marcussen. [21-1504] (AVN) [Entered: 08/19/2021 02:17 PM] |
ORDER directing payment of the filing fee under PLRA. [21-1504] (KPC) [Entered: 07/30/2021 02:19 PM] |
PLRA RESPONSE filed by Appellant Richard Lee Paiva. [21-1504] (CMP) [Entered: 07/29/2021 08:52 AM] |
LETTER sent to Appellant Richard Lee Paiva regarding service and in forma pauperis status. [21-1504] (GRC) [Entered: 07/26/2021 10:16 AM] |
LETTER filed by Appellant Richard Lee Paiva regarding service and brief. [21-1504] (GRC) [Entered: 07/20/2021 04:53 PM] |
PLRA LETTER issued. IFP is pending in district court. PLRA forms sent. PLRA response due 07/26/2021. [21-1504] (DO) [Entered: 07/12/2021 09:42 AM] |
BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 08/23/2021 for appellant Richard Lee Paiva. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. Please see the court's general order issued April 20, 2020, requiring the electronic filing of appendices. [21-1504] (DO) [Entered: 07/12/2021 09:55 AM] |
CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #8) filed by Appellant Richard Lee Paiva. Fee due 07/23/2021. [21-1504] (DO) [Entered: 07/09/2021 12:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Paiva v. Grande, et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: RICHARD LEE PAIVA | |
Represented By: | Richard Lee Paiva |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: KAREN GRANDE, individually and in her official capacity as a doctor at RIDOC | |
Represented By: | Peter F. Neronha |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: PAULINE MARCUSSEN, individually and in her official capacity as a doctor at RIDOC | |
Represented By: | Peter F. Neronha |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: JUSTIN BERK, individually and in his official capacity as a doctor at RIDOC | |
Represented By: | Peter F. Neronha |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.