International Van Lines, Inc. v. Ad Practitioners, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant: INTERNATIONAL VAN LINES, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: AD PRACTITIONERS, LLC
Case Number: 21-1622
Filed: August 18, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2021 ASSENTED TO MOTION to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant International Van Lines, Inc.. Certificate of service dated 10/06/2021. [21-1622] (AJC) [Entered: 10/06/2021 08:13 AM]
October 1, 2021 REQUEST for removal from the service list filed by Attorney Venkat Balasubramani for Appellee Ad Practitioners, LLC. Certificate of service was not included. [21-1622] (ALW) [Entered: 10/01/2021 11:49 PM]
October 1, 2021 NOTICE allowing request for removal from service list. The following attorney has been removed from the service list for this case: Venkat Balasubramani for Ad Practitioners, LLC. [21-1622] (ALW) [Entered: 10/01/2021 11:50 PM]
September 17, 2021 NOTICE issued. After 10/01/2021, the following attorney will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless he registers for an appellate ECF account: Venkat Balasubramani for Ad Practitioners, LLC. [21-1622] (ALW) [Entered: 09/17/2021 11:49 PM]
September 7, 2021 BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 10/18/2021 for appellant International Van Lines, Inc.. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. Please see the court's general order issued April 20, 2020, requiring the electronic filing of appendices. [21-1622] (ALW) [Entered: 09/07/2021 09:18 AM]
August 31, 2021 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Ad Practitioners, LLC filed by Attorney Diego Murgia Diaz. Certificate of service dated 08/31/2021. [21-1622] (DM) [Entered: 08/31/2021 10:19 AM]
August 31, 2021 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant International Van Lines, Inc. filed by Attorney ALBERTO J CASTANER-PADRO. Certificate of service dated 08/31/2021. [21-1622] (AJC) [Entered: 08/31/2021 02:30 PM]
August 31, 2021 DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant International Van Lines, Inc.. Certificate of service dated 08/31/2021. [21-1622] (AJC) [Entered: 08/31/2021 03:07 PM]
August 24, 2021 CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #23) filed by Appellant International Van Lines, Inc.. Docketing Statement and Appearance form due 09/07/2021. [21-1622]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (ALW) [Entered: 08/24/2021 12:55 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: International Van Lines, Inc. v. Ad Practitioners, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: INTERNATIONAL VAN LINES, INC.
Represented By: Alberto J. Castaner-Padro III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: AD PRACTITIONERS, LLC
Represented By: Venkat Balasubramani
Represented By: Maria Elena Martinez-Casado
Represented By: Diego Murgia-Diaz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?