Morales Posada, et al v. Cultural Care, Inc.
| KAREN MORALES POSADA, AMANDA SARMENTO FERREIRA GUIMARAES, WILLIANA ROCHA and SARA BARRIENTOS |
| CULTURAL CARE, INC. and CULTURAL CARE, INC., a Massachusetts Corporation |
| 21-1676 |
| August 31, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE issued. After 11/04/2021, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Gavin Frisch for Cultural Care, Inc., H. Clara Coleman for Karen Morales Posada and Alexander N. Hood for Karen Morales Posada. [21-1676] (GAK) [Entered: 10/21/2021 12:21 PM] |
| REPLY filed by Appellees Sara Barrientos, Amanda Sarmento Ferreira Guimaraes, Karen Morales Posada, Williana Rocha and Appellant Cultural Care, Inc. to response [ # 6448171-2 ]. Certificate of service dated 09/29/2021. [21-1676] (DHS) [Entered: 09/29/2021 11:42 PM] |
| NOTICE issued. After 10/08/2021, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Gavin Frisch for Cultural Care, Inc., H. Clara Coleman for Karen Morales Posada, Matthew C. Helland for Karen Morales Posada, Amanda Sarmento Ferreira Guimaraes, Williana Rocha and Sara Barrientos, Alexander N. Hood for Karen Morales Posada and Peter Rukin for Karen Morales Posada. [21-1676] (GAK) [Entered: 09/24/2021 01:36 PM] |
| RESPONSE filed by Appellant Cultural Care, Inc. to motion to dismiss or for summary disposition [ # 6445668-2 ]. Certificate of service dated 09/22/2021. [21-1676] (KMS) [Entered: 09/22/2021 10:39 PM] |
| DISCLOSURE statement filed by Appellant Cultural Care, Inc.. Certificate of service dated 09/22/2021. [21-1676] (GAK) [Entered: 09/23/2021 08:52 AM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Cultural Care, Inc.. Certificate of service dated 09/13/2021. [21-1676] (KMS) [Entered: 09/13/2021 08:44 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Cultural Care, Inc. indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. Certificate of service dated 09/13/2021. [21-1676] (KMS) [Entered: 09/13/2021 08:43 PM] |
| MOTION to dismiss or for summary disposition filed by Appellees Sara Barrientos, Amanda Sarmento Ferreira Guimaraes, Karen Morales Posada, Williana Rocha and Appellant Cultural Care, Inc.. Certificate of service dated 09/12/2021. [21-1676] (DHS) [Entered: 09/12/2021 10:02 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees Sara Barrientos, Amanda Sarmento Ferreira Guimaraes, Karen Morales Posada, and Williana Rocha. filed by Attorney David H Seligman. Certificate of service dated 09/10/2021. [21-1676] CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (DHS) [Entered: 09/10/2021 01:13 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Cultural Care, Inc. filed by Attorney Kathleen M. Sullivan. Certificate of service dated 09/07/2021. [21-1676] (KMS) [Entered: 09/07/2021 11:46 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Cultural Care, Inc. filed by Attorney Harvey J. Wolkoff. Certificate of service dated 09/07/2021. [21-1676] (HJW) [Entered: 09/07/2021 11:48 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Cultural Care, Inc. filed by Attorney William B. Adams. Certificate of service dated 09/07/2021. [21-1676] (WBA) [Entered: 09/07/2021 11:50 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #142) filed by Appellant Cultural Care, Inc.. Docketing Statement and Appearance form due 09/14/2021. [21-1676] (GAK) [Entered: 08/31/2021 11:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
