Hooker v. US
JESSE BELANGER, SPENCER CHRISTIE, CLAIRMONT FORDE, ANDREW LECONTE and DEAN KNIGHTLY |
SAMUEL HOOKER |
UNITED STATES |
21-1825 |
October 13, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTAL record filed consisting of district court docket entry nos. 143, 144. [21-1825] (CMP) [Entered: 10/29/2021 12:17 PM] |
MOTION for Attorney Courtney H.G. Herz and Chloe F.P. Golden to withdraw; for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Samuel Hooker. Certificate of service dated 10/26/2021. [21-1825]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (CHH) [Entered: 10/26/2021 12:56 PM] |
DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Samuel Hooker. Certificate of service dated 10/26/2021. [21-1825] (CHH) [Entered: 10/26/2021 12:40 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Samuel Hooker indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. Certificate of service dated 10/26/2021. [21-1825] (CHH) [Entered: 10/26/2021 12:38 PM] |
Request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal filed by Appellant Samuel Hooker was granted in the district court by order dated 10/19/2017. [21-1825] (CMP) [Entered: 10/18/2021 12:31 PM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee US filed by Attorney James D. Concannon. Certificate of service dated 10/15/2021. [21-1825] (JDC) [Entered: 10/15/2021 10:35 AM] |
CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #139) filed by Appellant Samuel Hooker. Docketing Statement due 10/27/2021. Appearance form due 10/27/2021. Fee due 10/27/2021. [21-1825] (CMP) [Entered: 10/13/2021 04:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.