HibiscusPR 322, LLC v. Lorenzo-Orama, et al
| HIBISCUSPR 322, LLC |
| RAMON LORENZO-ORAMA, ONEIDA LORENZO-DEL VALLE, MICHAEL LORENZO-DEL VALLE, GISELLE LORENZO-DEL VALLE, S.L.G., M.G.L.G., JANE DOE, JOHN DOE, ELIZAIDA GONZALEZ-TORRES, Mother of Minors, STEVEN LORENZO-GONZALEZ and MICHAEL GABRIEL LORENZO-GONZALEZ |
| 21-1844 |
| October 19, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RESPONSE filed by Appellants Giselle Lorenzo-Del Valle, Michael Lorenzo-Del Valle, Oneida Lorenzo-Del Valle, Michael Gabriel Lorenzo-Gonzalez, Steven Lorenzo-Gonzalez and Ramon Lorenzo-Orama to order [ # 6459429-2 ]. Certificate of service dated 11/26/2021. [21-1844] [21-1844] CLERK'S NOTE: The ECF filer did not select the option that best describes the document. Correction made by clerk's office. No further action required. (EWG) [Entered: 11/26/2021 01:58 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee HibiscusPR 322, LLC filed by Attorney Nayuan Zouairabani. Certificate of service dated 11/15/2021. [21-1844] (NZ) [Entered: 11/15/2021 08:27 AM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellants Giselle Lorenzo-Del Valle, Michael Lorenzo-Del Valle, Oneida Lorenzo-Del Valle, Michael Gabriel Lorenzo-Gonzalez, Steven Lorenzo-Gonzalez and Ramon Lorenzo-Orama. Certificate of service dated 11/03/2021. [21-1844] (JMP) [Entered: 11/15/2021 09:55 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellants Giselle Lorenzo-Del Valle, Michael Lorenzo-Del Valle, Oneida Lorenzo-Del Valle, Michael Gabriel Lorenzo-Gonzalez, Ramon Lorenzo-Orama and Steven Lorenzo-Gonzalez filed by Attorney JOSE MIGUEL PEREZ-VILLANUEVA. Certificate of service dated 11/03/2021. [21-1844] (JMP) [Entered: 11/15/2021 09:58 AM] |
| CORRECTED ORDER* entered: It is hereby ordered that defendants-appellants show cause, in writing filed by November 26, 2021 , why the appeal should include review of the judgment entered on June 10, 2021 (D.E. No. 77) and the opinion and order entered on June 10, 2021 (D.E. No. 76). The failure to respond will result in limiting this appeal to review only of the September 8, 2021 order denying defendants-appellants' motion to alter or amend judgment. *Corrected Order issued to edit text in final paragraph. [21-1844] (JMK) [Entered: 11/15/2021 04:10 PM] |
ORDER entered: It is hereby ordered that defendants-appellants show cause, in writing filed by November 26, 2021 , why the appeal should include review of the from the judgment entered on June 10, 2021 (D.E. No. 77), the opinion and order entered on June 10, 2021 (D.E. No. 76). The failure to respond will result in limiting this appeal to review only of the September 8, 2021 order denying defendants-appellants' motion to alter or amend judgment. [21-1844]. (JMK) [Entered: 11/12/2021 04:36 PM]
|
|
ORDER entered: Upon consideration of appellants' motion to clarify, and upon review of the record in this case, the caption has been amended as it appears above. [21-1844] (JMK) [Entered: 11/12/2021 04:28 PM]
|
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee HibiscusPR 322, LLC filed by Attorney Leany Prieto-Rodriguez. Certificate of service dated 11/12/2021. [21-1844] (LP) [Entered: 11/12/2021 01:45 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellants Ramon Lorenzo-Orama, Oneida Lorenzo-Del Valle, Michael Lorenzo-Del Valle, Giselle Lorenzo-Del Valle, S.L.G. and M.G.L.G. filed by Attorney Eugenio W.A. Geigel Simounet, Esq.. Certificate of service dated 11/10/2021. [21-1844] (EWG) [Entered: 11/10/2021 08:11 AM] |
| MOTION to clarify the names of the appellants filed by Appellants Giselle Lorenzo-Del Valle, Michael Lorenzo-Del Valle, Oneida Lorenzo-Del Valle, Ramon Lorenzo-Orama, M.G.L.G. and S.L.G.. Certificate of service was not included. [21-1844] CLERK'S NOTE: The ECF filer did not select the option that best describes the document. Correction made by clerk's office. (JMP) [Entered: 11/05/2021 01:09 PM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellants Giselle Lorenzo-Del Valle, Michael Lorenzo-Del Valle, Oneida Lorenzo-Del Valle, Ramon Lorenzo-Orama, M.G.L.G. and S.L.G.. Certificate of service dated 11/03/2021. [21-1844] (JMP) [Entered: 11/03/2021 02:34 PM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellants Elizaida Gonzalez-Torres, Giselle Lorenzo-Del Valle, Michael Lorenzo-Del Valle, Oneida Lorenzo-Del Valle, Ramon Lorenzo-Orama, M.G.L.G., S.L.G., Jane Doe and John Doe. Certificate of service dated 11/01/2021. [21-1844] (JMP) [Entered: 11/01/2021 11:36 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellants Jane Doe, John Doe, Elizaida Gonzalez-Torres, Giselle Lorenzo-Del Valle, Michael Lorenzo-Del Valle, Oneida Lorenzo-Del Valle, Ramon Lorenzo-Orama, M.G.L.G., S.L.G. and Appellee HibiscusPR 322, LLC filed by Attorney Eugenio W.A. Geigel Simounet Esq.. Certificate of service dated 10/29/2021. [21-1844] (EWG) [Entered: 10/29/2021 02:17 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellants Jane Doe, John Doe, Elizaida Gonzalez-Torres, Giselle Lorenzo-Del Valle, Michael Lorenzo-Del Valle, Oneida Lorenzo-Del Valle, Ramon Lorenzo-Orama, M.G.L.G. and S.L.G. filed by Attorney Eugenio W.A. Geigel Simounet Esq.. Certificate of service dated 10/29/2021. [21-1844] (EWG) [Entered: 10/29/2021 02:25 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #92) filed by Appellants Jane Doe, John Doe, Elizaida Gonzalez-Torres, Giselle Lorenzo-Del Valle, Michael Lorenzo-Del Valle, Oneida Lorenzo-Del Valle, Ramon Lorenzo-Orama, M.G.L.G. and S.L.G. Appearance form and Docketing Statement due 11/02/2021 . Fee due 11/04/2021 . [21-1844]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (JMK) [Entered: 10/19/2021 10:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
