Larsen v. Aroostook Mental Health Center

Larsen v. Aroostook Mental Health Center

Plaintiff / Appellant:	RICHARD ALLEN LARSEN, III
Defendant / Appellee:	AROOSTOOK MENTAL HEALTH CENTER
Case Number:	21-1859
Filed:	November 1, 2021
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
December 6, 2021	ORDER to Show Cause entered. Upon review, it appears that appellant Richard A. Larsen, III is ineligible to bring an appeal in a civil action in forma pauperis or to pay the filing fee in installments under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. 1915, because he has filed more than three lawsuits that have been dismissed as frivolous. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), an appellant who has "three strikes" against him may not appeal from a judgment in a civil action without prepaying the full fee unless he is "under imminent danger of serious physical injury." Accordingly, appellant is ordered either to pay the full $505 filing fee in the district court and submit proof of having done so, or show cause in writing why this appeal should be allowed to proceed. The failure to take either action by December 20, 2021 will lead to dismissal of the appeal for lack of diligent prosecution. See 1st Cir. R. 3.0(b) [21-1859] (GAK) [Entered: 12/06/2021 11:24 AM]
November 1, 2021	CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #12) filed by Appellant Richard Allen Larsen, III. Fee due 11/15/2021. [21-1859] (GAK) [Entered: 11/01/2021 09:30 AM]

Date Filed

Document Text

December 6, 2021

ORDER to Show Cause entered. Upon review, it appears that appellant Richard A. Larsen, III is ineligible to bring an appeal in a civil action in forma pauperis or to pay the filing fee in installments under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. 1915, because he has filed more than three lawsuits that have been dismissed as frivolous. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), an appellant who has "three strikes" against him may not appeal from a judgment in a civil action without prepaying the full fee unless he is "under imminent danger of serious physical injury." Accordingly, appellant is ordered either to pay the full $505 filing fee in the district court and submit proof of having done so, or show cause in writing why this appeal should be allowed to proceed. The failure to take either action by December 20, 2021 will lead to dismissal of the appeal for lack of diligent prosecution. See 1st Cir. R. 3.0(b) [21-1859] (GAK) [Entered: 12/06/2021 11:24 AM]

November 1, 2021

CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #12) filed by Appellant Richard Allen Larsen, III. Fee due 11/15/2021. [21-1859] (GAK) [Entered: 11/01/2021 09:30 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Larsen v. Aroostook Mental Health Center
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RICHARD ALLEN LARSEN, III
Represented By:	Richard Allen Larsen III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: AROOSTOOK MENTAL HEALTH CENTER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?