Martillo v. Twitter, Inc., et al
| JOACHIM C. MARTILLO |
| TWITTER, INC., FACEBOOK, INC., A MEDIUM CORPORATION, LINKEDIN CORPORATION, THE STANFORD DAILY PUBLISHING CORPORATION and HARVARD CRIMSON, INC. |
| 21-1921 |
| November 15, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Housing/Accommodations |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| U.S. SUPREME COURT NOTICE advising a petition for a writ of certiorari was filed on 12/07/2022 and assigned case number 22-532. [21-1921] (ALW) [Entered: 12/12/2022 07:20 PM] |
| MANDATE issued. [21-1921] (ALW) [Entered: 10/26/2022 08:28 AM] |
| JUDGMENT entered by William J. Kayatta, Jr., Appellate Judge; Jeffrey R. Howard, Appellate Judge and Gustavo A. Gelpi, Jr., Appellate Judge: The sua sponte dismissal of this action under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) is summarily affirmed , essentially for the reasons discussed by the district court in its Order of October 15, 2021. See 1st Cir. R. 27.0(c). Affirmed. [21-1921] (ALW) [Entered: 10/04/2022 12:51 PM] |
| NOTICE of Supplemental 5th Circuit Authority filed by Appellant Joachim C. Martillo. Served on 09/18/2022. [21-1921] (JCM) [Entered: 09/18/2022 03:45 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee A Medium Corporation filed by Attorney Anuj Khetarpal. Served on 06/22/2022. [21-1921] (AKK) [Entered: 06/22/2022 03:16 PM] |
ORDER entered: Upon consideration, Attorney Anuj K. Khetarpal's motion for leave to enter an appearance on behalf of defendant-appellee A Medium Corporation is granted. Attorney Khetarpal's notice of appearance form is due by June 27, 2022 . Further, the request to withdraw Attorney Gabriel Rossman as counsel for defendant-appellee A Medium Corporation is granted. Attorney Rossman is hereby withdrawn as counsel of record, and appellee will continue to be represented by its remaining counsel of record. [21-1921] (ALW) [Entered: 06/22/2022 11:15 AM]
|
| MOTION for Attorney Gabriel I. Rossman to withdraw as counsel and to enter appearance of Anuj K. Khetarpal as counsel for Appellee A Medium Corporation filed by Appellee A Medium Corporation. Served on 06/17/2022. [21-1921] CLERK'S NOTE: Relief selection was incomplete. Correction made by clerk's office. No further action required. (GR) [Entered: 06/17/2022 11:12 AM] |
| NOTICE of Supplemental SCOTUS Authority filed by Appellant Joachim C. Martillo. Served on 06/07/2022. [21-1921] (JCM) [Entered: 06/07/2022 02:35 PM] |
| CASE submitted. Panel: William J. Kayatta, Jr., Appellate Judge; Jeffrey R. Howard, Appellate Judge; Gustavo A. Gelpi, Jr., Appellate Judge. [21-1921] (DJT) [Entered: 06/03/2022 01:34 PM] |
| CITATION of supplemental authorities pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 28(j) filed by Appellant Joachim C. Martillo. Served on 05/29/2022. [21-1921] CLERK'S NOTE: Relief selection was incorrect. Correction made by clerk's office. No further action required. (JCM) [Entered: 05/29/2022 03:05 PM] |
| NINE (9) paper copies of appellee's brief [ # 6485593-2 ] submitted by Appellee A Medium Corporation. [21-1921] (YCC) [Entered: 04/01/2022 11:56 AM] |
| BRIEF tendered by Appellant Joachim C. Martillo. [21-1921] (JCM) [Entered: 03/31/2022 10:13 AM] |
| SIX (6) paper copies of reply brief [ # 6485597-2 ] submitted by Appellant Joachim C. Martillo. [21-1921] (YCC) [Entered: 03/30/2022 02:45 PM] |
| U.S. SUPREME COURT ORDER entered on 03/28/2022. The petition for a writ of certiorari was denied. [21-1921] (JAW) [Entered: 03/30/2022 03:33 PM] |
| DISCLOSURE statement filed by Appellee A Medium Corporation. Served on 03/25/2022. [21-1921] (LIM) [Entered: 03/28/2022 12:03 PM] |
| APPELLEE'S BRIEF filed by Appellee A Medium Corporation. Served on 03/25/2022. Nine paper copies identical to that of the electronically filed brief must be submitted so that they are received by the court on or before 04/04/2022 . Reply brief due 04/15/2022 for APPELLANT Joachim C. Martillo. [21-1921] (LIM) [Entered: 03/28/2022 12:02 PM] |
| REPLY BRIEF filed by Appellant Joachim C. Martillo. Served on 03/16/2022. Three paper copies identical to that of the electronically filed brief must be submitted so that they are received by the court on or before 04/04/2022 . [21-1921] (LIM) [Entered: 03/28/2022 12:05 PM] |
| BRIEF tendered by Appellee A Medium Corporation. [21-1921] (SPK) [Entered: 03/25/2022 08:35 PM] |
| NOTICE of Typos in Reply to Twitter's Brief filed by Appellant Joachim C. Martillo. Served on 03/18/2022. [21-1921] (JCM) [Entered: 03/18/2022 01:50 AM] |
| BRIEF tendered by Appellant Joachim C. Martillo. [21-1921] (JCM) [Entered: 03/16/2022 10:53 AM] |
| NINE (9) paper copies of appellee's brief [ # 6482382-2 ] submitted by Appellee Twitter, Inc.. [21-1921] (YCC) [Entered: 03/15/2022 11:40 AM] |
| APPELLEE'S BRIEF filed by Appellee Twitter, Inc. Served on 03/11/2022. Nine paper copies identical to that of the electronically filed brief must be submitted so that they are received by the court on or before 03/21/2022 . [21-1921] (LIM) [Entered: 03/14/2022 08:49 AM] |
| DISCLOSURE statement filed by Appellee Twitter, Inc. Served on 03/11/2022. [21-1921] (LIM) [Entered: 03/14/2022 08:50 AM] |
| BRIEF tendered by Appellee Twitter, Inc.. [21-1921] (KNT) [Entered: 03/11/2022 04:37 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE of service for [ # 6459531-2 ] filed by Appellant Joachim C. Martillo. Served on 03/02/2022. [21-1921] (JCM) [Entered: 03/03/2022 08:05 AM] |
|
ORDER entered: Upon consideration of Appellee A Medium Corporation's motion for an extension of time and Appellant Joachim C. Martillo's response of non-opposition, the motion is granted and A Medium Corporation's brief is due on or before March 25, 2022 . [21-1921] (ALW) [Entered: 02/23/2022 11:42 PM]
|
| RESPONSE filed by Appellant Joachim C. Martillo to to extend time to file brief and/or appendix [ # 6478019-2 ]. Served on 02/20/2022. [21-1921] (JCM) [Entered: 02/20/2022 05:33 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee A Medium Corporation filed by Attorney Sarah P. Kelly. Served on 02/18/2022. [21-1921] (SPK) [Entered: 02/18/2022 01:08 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee A Medium Corporation filed by Attorney Gabriel I. Rossman. Served on 02/18/2022. [21-1921] (GR) [Entered: 02/18/2022 01:14 PM] |
| MOTION to extend time to file brief filed by Appellee A Medium Corporation. Served on 02/18/2022. [21-1921] (GR) [Entered: 02/18/2022 06:32 PM] |
|
ORDER entered by Jeffrey R. Howard, Chief Appellate Judge: Having considered the pending filings, and in view of appellee having CM/ECF access to appellant's brief, it is ordered that appellee may file an answering brief within thirty days of the date of this order. [21-1921] (ALW) [Entered: 02/09/2022 10:20 PM]
|
| BRIEFING schedule updated. Brief due 03/11/2022 for appellee Twitter, Inc.. [21-1921] (ALW) [Entered: 02/09/2022 10:24 PM] |
| NOTICE of Parallel SCOTUS Filing of Application for Clarification etc filed by Appellant Joachim C. Martillo. Served on 02/02/2022. [21-1921] (JCM) [Entered: 02/02/2022 12:37 AM] |
| REPLY filed by Appellant Joachim C. Martillo to [ # 6473654-2 ]. Served on 02/01/2022. [21-1921] (JCM) [Entered: 02/01/2022 05:50 AM] |
| NOTICE Status Report -- Related Case filed by Appellant Joachim C. Martillo. Served on 01/31/2022. [21-1921] (JCM) [Entered: 01/31/2022 03:19 PM] |
| RESPONSE filed by Appellee Twitter, Inc. to to clarify [ # 6472697-2 ]. Served on 01/27/2022. [21-1921] (KNT) [Entered: 01/27/2022 08:24 AM] |
| MOTION to Dismiss Both Notice of Appearance and Also Notice of Non-Service of Appellants Brief [ # 6461216-2 ] filed by Appellant Joachim C. Martillo. Served on 01/23/2022. [21-1921] CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (JCM) [Entered: 01/23/2022 03:13 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Twitter, Inc. filed by Attorney Kenneth N. Thayer. Served on 01/18/2022. [21-1921] (KNT) [Entered: 01/18/2022 09:40 AM] |
| NOTICE of Deficient Service of Appellant Brief filed by Appellee Twitter, Inc.. Served on 01/18/2022. [21-1921] (KNT) [Entered: 01/18/2022 03:26 PM] |
| THREE (3) paper copies of appellant's brief [ # 6467822-2 ] submitted by Appellant Joachim C. Martillo. [21-1921] (YCC) [Entered: 12/29/2021 02:54 PM] |
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF filed by Appellant Joachim C. Martillo. Certificate of service dated 12/26/2021. Three paper copies identical to that of the electronically filed brief must be submitted so that they are received by the court on or before 01/03/2022 . [21-1921] (LIM) [Entered: 12/27/2021 08:18 AM] |
| APPENDIX filed by Appellant Joachim C. Martillo. Served on 12/26/2021. [21-1921] (LIM) [Entered: 12/27/2021 08:28 AM] |
| APPENDIX tendered by Appellant Joachim C. Martillo. Served on 12/26/2021. [21-1921] (JCM) [Entered: 12/26/2021 08:33 AM] |
| BRIEF tendered by Appellant Joachim C. Martillo. [21-1921] (JCM) [Entered: 12/26/2021 08:31 AM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Joachim C. Martillo. Certificate of service dated 11/26/2021. [21-1921] (JCM) [Entered: 11/26/2021 02:30 AM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 01/03/2022 for appellant Joachim C. Martillo. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. Please see the court's general order issued April 20, 2020, requiring the electronic filing of appendices. [21-1921] (ALW) [Entered: 11/23/2021 03:11 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Joachim C. Martillo indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. Certificate of service dated 11/19/2021. [21-1921] (JCM) [Entered: 11/19/2021 10:42 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #9) filed by Appellant Joachim C. Martillo. [21-1921] (ALW) [Entered: 11/16/2021 12:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
