Aleman Castillo v. Garland
| RUBEN ALEJANDRO ALEMAN CASTILLO |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General |
| 21-1943 |
| November 18, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland filed by Attorney Jessica D. Strokus. Certificate of service dated 11/19/2021. [21-1943] (JDS) [Entered: 11/19/2021 11:58 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland filed by Attorney Anthony C. Payne. Certificate of service dated 11/19/2021. [21-1943] (ACP) [Entered: 11/19/2021 12:01 PM] |
| AGENCY CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioner Ruben Alejandro Aleman Castillo. Appearance form due 12/02/2021. Fee due 12/02/2021. Administrative record due 12/28/2021. Copy of petition served on respondent(s) pursuant to FRAP 15(c). [21-1943] (AL) [Entered: 11/18/2021 04:33 PM] |
| NOTICE regarding application of Local Rule 18.0. [21-1943] (AL) [Entered: 11/18/2021 04:35 PM] |
| MOTION to stay removal contained within the petition for review filed by Petitioner Ruben Alejandro Aleman Castillo. Certificate of service dated 11/18/2021. [21-1943] (AL) [Entered: 11/18/2021 04:40 PM] |
ORDER entered: Petitioner has filed a motion to stay removal. This order is issued in accordance with First Circuit Local Rule 18.0. Removal of the petitioner is hereby stayed for ten business days from the date of this order. The government shall file its response to the motion in accordance with the Local Rule. [21-1943] (AL) [Entered: 11/18/2021 04:58 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
