Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Limenos Corporation
| ALEXANDRA MARTINEZ-OTERO |
| EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION |
| LIMENOS CORPORATION, d/b/a Ceviche House |
| 21-1944 |
| November 19, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER entered: Attorney Jesus R. Morales-Cordero and Attorney Nelson Robles-Diaz have moved to withdraw as counsel on behalf of defendant-appellee Limenos Corporation. Because only individuals may proceed pro se, Limenos Corporation must retain new counsel to maintain this appeal. Therefore, the motion to withdraw is denied without prejudice to renewal once successor counsel enters an appearance on appellee's behalf. A copy of this order will be served on appellee's respective representatives. [21-1944] (DO) [Entered: 01/12/2022 02:56 PM]
|
| MOTION for Attorney JESUS R. MORALES CORDERO, NELSON ROBLES DIAZ to withdraw as counsel filed by Appellant Limenos Corporation. Served on 01/07/2022. [21-1944] (JRM) [Entered: 01/07/2022 06:51 AM] |
| NOTICE issued. The following attorneys have failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: Nelson Robles-Diaz for Limenos Corporation, Beatriz Biscardi-Andre for Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Carmen Manrara Cartaya for Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. [21-1944] (GRC) [Entered: 01/06/2022 03:57 PM] |
| Mailings returned as undeliverable to Attorney Marcelle D. Martell for Appellant Limenos Corporation. Copies of orders issued December 10, 2021. [21-1944] (ATC) [Entered: 01/11/2022 10:44 AM] |
| CERTIFICATE of service for docketing statement [ # 6467801-2 ], notice of appearance [ # 6467800-2 ] filed by Appellant Limenos Corporation. Served on 12/26/2021. [21-1944] (JRM) [Entered: 12/26/2021 12:38 PM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Limenos Corporation. Served on 12/26/2021. [21-1944] (JRM) [Entered: 12/26/2021 12:35 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Limenos Corporation filed by Attorney Jesus R. Morales-Cordero. Served on 12/26/2021. [21-1944] (JRM) [Entered: 12/26/2021 12:34 PM] |
| Mail returned as undeliverable to Attorney Marcelle D. Martell for Appellant Limenos Corporation. Copy of case opening notice issued November 24, 2021. [21-1944] (ATC) [Entered: 12/27/2021 10:24 AM] |
| NOTICE issued. After 12/27/2021, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Marcelle D. Martell for Limenos Corporation, Nelson Robles-Diaz for Limenos Corporation, Beatriz Biscardi-Andre for Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Carmen Manrara Cartaya for Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. [21-1944] (GRC) [Entered: 12/10/2021 04:58 PM] |
| NOTICE of default and intent to dismiss issued. The appellant is directed to file an appearance form and docketing statement or this case will be dismissed for lack of prosecution in accordance with 1st Cir. R. 3.0(b). Appearance form due 12/27/2021. Docketing Statement due 12/27/2021. [21-1944] (GRC) [Entered: 12/10/2021 05:01 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed by Attorney James M. Tucker. Certificate of service dated 11/26/2021. [21-1944] (JT) [Entered: 11/26/2021 07:48 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #65) filed by Appellant Limenos Corporation. Appearance form and Docketing Statement due 12/08/2021. [21-1944] (GRC) [Entered: 11/24/2021 03:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
