Wedington v. Boncher
| CALVIN SCOTT WEDINGTON |
| AMY BONCHER, Warden, FMC Devens |
| 22-1046 |
| January 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| General (Habeas Corpus) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF filed by Appellant Calvin Scott Wedington. Number of copies: 1. Served on 02/20/2022. Brief due 03/30/2022 for APPELLEE Amy Boncher. [22-1046] (AVN) [Entered: 02/28/2022 03:29 PM] |
| CORRECTED ORDER entered.* Upon filing a notice of appeal, the appellant is required to pay the filing fee to the clerk of the district court in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 3(e). Appellant is presently in default as to this filing. If appellant is indigent and unable to pay the fee, appellant may file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") with this court pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24. A compliant request for IFP status consists of a motion, fully completed Form 4, Financial Affidavit, and prison trust account statement, if incarcerated. Unless this court is provided with notice of paying the filing fee to the clerk of the district court, or filing a motion seeking in forma pauperis status with this court by March 3, 2022, this appeal will be dismissed for lack of prosecution. * Corrected is hereby entered to correct the text of the order. [22-1046] (GAK) [Entered: 02/18/2022 04:58 PM] |
| NOTICE of default and intent to dismiss for failure to pay the filing fee. Fee due 03/03/2022. [22-1046] (GAK) [Entered: 02/17/2022 01:18 PM] |
| DOCKET sheet sent to appellant. [22-1046] (JAW) [Entered: 02/07/2022 01:43 PM] |
| LETTER sent to Appellant Calvin Scott Wedington in response to his letter dated February 2, 2022 related to the informal brief received on January 26, 2022. [22-1046] (JAW) [Entered: 02/07/2022 01:41 PM] |
| LETTER filed by Appellant Calvin Scott Wedington requesting a copy of the docket sheet. Certificate of service was not included. [22-1046] (JAW) [Entered: 02/04/2022 03:36 PM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 03/08/2022 for appellant Calvin Scott Wedington. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. Please see the court's general order issued April 20, 2020, requiring the electronic filing of appendices. [22-1046] (JAW) [Entered: 01/27/2022 02:07 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #23) filed by Appellant Calvin Scott Wedington. Fee due 02/04/2022 . [22-1046] (JAW) [Entered: 01/21/2022 01:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Wedington v. Boncher | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: CALVIN SCOTT WEDINGTON | |
| Represented By: | Calvin Scott Wedington |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: AMY BONCHER, Warden, FMC Devens | |
| Represented By: | Donald Campbell Lockhart |
| Represented By: | Michael P. Sady |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
