Lu v. Lima, et al
| BOODIE UGNUMBA and G4S SECURE SOLUTIONS (USA), INC |
| FRIEDRICH LU |
| MELANIE LIMA and BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY, TRUSTEES |
| 22-1085 |
| February 4, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing fee was paid in the district court by Appellant Friedrich Lu on 03/15/2022. [22-1085] (GAK) [Entered: 04/01/2022 02:03 PM] |
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF filed by Appellant Friedrich Lu. Number of copies: 5. Served on 03/22/2022. Brief due 04/21/2022 for APPELLEES Boston Public Library, Trustees and Melanie Lima. [22-1085] (LIM) [Entered: 03/24/2022 08:31 AM] |
| NOTICE of appellant's opening brief is affixed with no addendum filed by Appellant Friedrich Lu. Certificate of service was not included. [22-1085] (GB) [Entered: 03/24/2022 10:07 AM] |
| MOTION to recuse all judges of this circuit filed by Appellant Friedrich Lu. Certificate of service was not included. [22-1085] (GB) [Entered: 03/24/2022 10:50 AM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 03/21/2022 for appellant Friedrich Lu. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. Please see the court's general order issued April 20, 2020, requiring the electronic filing of appendices. [22-1085] (GB) [Entered: 02/08/2022 03:16 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #29) filed by Appellant Friedrich Lu. Fee due 02/18/2022 . [22-1085] (GB) [Entered: 02/04/2022 04:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
