Saninocencio, et al v. Pierce and Mandell, P.C., et al
Defendant: RICHARD E. WELCH, III, Superior Court Judge (Retired) and MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT
Plaintiff / Appellant: NELLIE SANINOCENCIO
Interested Party: GARY DOLAN
Defendant / Appellee: PIERCE AND MANDELL, P.C., LITCHFIELD CAVO, LLP and AVERY DOOLEY AND NOONE, LLP
Case Number: 22-1110
Filed: February 18, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2022 APPENDIX tendered by Appellant Gary Dolan. Served on 04/13/2022. [22-1110] (GD) [Entered: 04/18/2022 02:11 PM]
April 13, 2022 BRIEF tendered by Appellant Gary Dolan. [22-1110] CLERK'S NOTE: An appendix is a separate document which cannot be attached to the brief and must be filed in accordance with Fed. R. App. P 30(a)-(b). THE FILER IS DIRECTED TO RE-FILE THE DOCUMENT WITHIN TWO DAYS (4/18). (GD) [Entered: 04/13/2022 11:42 PM]
March 11, 2022 NOTICE of appearance filed by Attorney Peter H. Carroll for Appellees Pierce and Mandell, P.C., Litchfield Cavo, LLP and Avery Dooley and Noone, LLP. Certificate of service was not included. [22-1110] (JAW) [Entered: 03/11/2022 02:53 PM]
March 11, 2022 RESPONSE filed by Appellees Avery Dooley and Noone, LLP, Litchfield Cavo, LLP and Pierce and Mandell, P.C. to docketing statement [ # 6480650-2 ]. Served on 03/11/2022. [22-1110] (JAW) [Entered: 03/11/2022 02:55 PM]
March 7, 2022 NOTICE issued. After 03/21/2022, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Peter H. Carroll for Pierce and Mandell, P.C., Litchfield Cavo, LLP and Avery Dooley and Noone, LLP. [22-1110] (JAW) [Entered: 03/07/2022 06:22 PM]
March 4, 2022 BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 04/13/2022 for appellants Gary Dolan and Nellie Saninocencio. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. Please see the court's general order issued April 20, 2020, requiring the electronic filing of appendices. [22-1110] (JAW) [Entered: 03/04/2022 05:21 PM]
March 4, 2022 NOTICE of appearance filed by Attorney Gary Dolan for Appellants Nellie Saninocencio and Gary Dolan. Served on 03/03/2022. [22-1110] (JAW) [Entered: 03/04/2022 02:43 PM]
March 4, 2022 DOCKETING statement filed by Appellants Gary Dolan and Nellie Saninocencio. Served on 03/03/2022. [22-1110] (JAW) [Entered: 03/04/2022 02:46 PM]
March 4, 2022 TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellants Gary Dolan and Nellie Saninocencio indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. Served on 03/03/2022. [22-1110] (JAW) [Entered: 03/04/2022 02:50 PM]
February 18, 2022 CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #50) filed by Appellant Gary Dolan. Appearance form, Docketing Statement, and Transcript Report/Order form due 03/04/2022 . [22-1110] (JAW) [Entered: 02/18/2022 09:02 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Saninocencio, et al v. Pierce and Mandell, P.C., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: NELLIE SANINOCENCIO
Represented By: Gary Dolan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: GARY DOLAN
Represented By: Gary Dolan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PIERCE AND MANDELL, P.C.
Represented By: Peter H. Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LITCHFIELD CAVO, LLP
Represented By: Peter H. Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: AVERY DOOLEY AND NOONE, LLP
Represented By: Peter H. Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RICHARD E. WELCH, III, Superior Court Judge (Retired)
Represented By: Nicholas W. Rose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT
Represented By: Nicholas W. Rose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?