Menge v. Rettig
Petitioner / Appellant: BRYAN EDWARD MENGE
Respondent / Appellee: CHARLES P. RETTIG, Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service
Case Number: 22-1203
Filed: March 28, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2022 TAX COURT CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #106) filed by Appellant Bryan Edward Menge. Fee due 04/11/2022. Administrative record due 05/09/2022. [22-1203] (GRC) [Entered: 03/28/2022 03:31 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Menge v. Rettig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: BRYAN EDWARD MENGE
Represented By: Bryan Edward Menge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: CHARLES P. RETTIG, Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service
Represented By: Nina Ching
Represented By: Carlton W. King
Represented By: William M. Paul
Represented By: Francesca Ugolini
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?