US v. Carvajal
UNITED STATES |
BERNARDITO CARVAJAL |
22-1207 |
March 29, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
United States v. Carvajal |
US v. Carvajal |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CRIMINAL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #167) filed by Appellant Bernardito Carvajal. Appearance form due 04/12/2022. Docketing Statement due 04/12/2022. Transcript Report/Order form due 04/12/2022. [22-1207] (GRC) [Entered: 03/29/2022 04:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: US v. Carvajal | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Appellee: UNITED STATES | |
Represented By: | Stephen W. Hassink |
Represented By: | Donald Campbell Lockhart |
Represented By: | Elysa Q. Wan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: BERNARDITO CARVAJAL | |
Represented By: | Lenore Glaser |
Represented By: | Eduardo Antonio Masferrer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.