US v. Fusion Properties Management Group, Inc.
| KENDELL LANG, in his individual capacity, as personal representative of the Estate of Patricia Lang, and as trustee of the Cascade Professional Trust, CASCADE PROFESSIONAL TRUST, WHITE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER and STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Franchise Tax Board |
| UNITED STATES |
| FUSION PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC., d/b/a Fusion Farms |
| 22-1242 |
| April 4, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff or Defendant) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee US filed by Attorney Mariana E. Bauza-Almonte. Served on 06/02/2022. [22-1242] (MEB) [Entered: 06/02/2022 05:33 PM] |
ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant Fusion Properties Management Group, Inc. Brief and Appendix due 07/13/2022 for appellant Fusion Properties Management Group, Inc. [22-1242] (JMK) [Entered: 05/05/2022 08:29 AM]
|
| NOTICE issued. The following attorney has failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: Philip A. Doyle for US. [22-1242] (JMK) [Entered: 05/04/2022 09:38 AM] |
| ASSENTED TO MOTION to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant Fusion Properties Management Group, Inc.. Served on 05/04/2022. [22-1242] (MAK) [Entered: 05/04/2022 01:38 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Fusion Properties Management Group, Inc. filed by Attorney David Fernandez Esteves. Served on 05/04/2022. [22-1242] (DF) [Entered: 05/04/2022 08:54 PM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 06/13/2022 for appellant Fusion Properties Management Group, Inc. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. Please see the court's general order issued April 20, 2020, requiring the electronic filing of appendices. [22-1242] (JMK) [Entered: 05/02/2022 03:06 PM] |
| NOTICE issued. After 05/03/2022, the following attorney will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Philip A. Doyle for US. [22-1242] (JMK) [Entered: 04/19/2022 11:14 AM] |
| DISCLOSURE statement filed by Appellant Fusion Properties Management Group, Inc.. Served on 04/18/2022. [22-1242] (MAK) [Entered: 04/18/2022 09:09 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Fusion Properties Management Group, Inc. filed by Attorney Michael A. Kolcun. Served on 04/18/2022. [22-1242] (MAK) [Entered: 04/18/2022 09:07 AM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Fusion Properties Management Group, Inc.. Served on 04/18/2022. [22-1242] (MAK) [Entered: 04/18/2022 09:08 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Fusion Properties Management Group, Inc. indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. Served on 04/18/2022. [22-1242] (MAK) [Entered: 04/18/2022 09:08 AM] |
| CORRECTED Notice of appearance on behalf of Appellee US filed by Attorney Robert J. Branman. Served on 04/08/2022. [22-1242]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (RJB) [Entered: 04/08/2022 04:22 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee US filed by Attorney Robert J. Branman. Served on 04/05/2022. [22-1242] (RJB) [Entered: 04/05/2022 11:17 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #83) filed by Appellant Fusion Properties Management Group, Inc. Appearance form and Docketing Statement due 04/18/2022 . [22-1242] (JMK) [Entered: 04/04/2022 03:47 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
