Velasquez v. Flores, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: DIEGO VELASQUEZ
Defendant / Appellee: ANGELA MENDEZ FLORES, Senior Paralegal Specialist and MARK BITTNER, Acting Director, FOIA Operations
Case Number: 22-1252
Filed: April 13, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 6, 2022 JUDGMENT entered by David J. Barron, Chief Appellate Judge; Sandra L. Lynch, Appellate Judge and Rogeriee Thompson, Appellate Judge: Upon review of appellant's response to this court's order to show cause, the appeal is dismissed because there is no interlocutory jurisdiction from this non-final order. [22-1252] (ALW) [Entered: 06/06/2022 06:33 PM]
May 9, 2022 AFFIDAVIT in support of motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 6491022-2 ] filed by Appellant Diego Velasquez. [22-1252] (ALW) [Entered: 05/09/2022 04:36 PM]
May 9, 2022 RESPONSE filed by Appellant Diego Velasquez to order for lack of jurisdiction [ # 6492843-2 ]. Certificate of service was not included. [22-1252] CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (ALW) [Entered: 05/10/2022 11:43 AM]
May 2, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER denying as moot motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Diego Velasquez. [22-1252] (GAK) [Entered: 05/02/2022 12:39 PM]
May 2, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER to Show Cause entered directing appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Show cause response due 05/16/2022. [22-1252] (ALW) [Entered: 05/02/2022 11:45 AM]
April 21, 2022 SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT of Relief Sought filed by Appellant Diego Velasque. Certificate of service was not included. [22-1252]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (ALW) [Entered: 04/21/2022 02:04 PM]
April 21, 2022 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Diego Velasquez. Certificate of service was not included. [22-1252] (ALW) [Entered: 04/21/2022 02:08 PM]
April 13, 2022 Public docket note: Mark Bittner was appointed as Director of FOIA & Transparency. We have substituted him for Elliot Viker as the appellee. See Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2).[22-1252] (ALW) [Entered: 04/13/2022 04:58 PM]
April 13, 2022 CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #5 ) filed by Appellant Diego Velasquez. [22-1252]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (ALW) [Entered: 04/13/2022 04:38 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Velasquez v. Flores, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DIEGO VELASQUEZ
Represented By: Diego Velasquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ANGELA MENDEZ FLORES, Senior Paralegal Specialist
Represented By: Lauren S. Zurier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MARK BITTNER, Acting Director, FOIA Operations
Represented By: Lauren S. Zurier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?