Brayman v. Maguire
| RAYMOND PORTER, GARY CRAFTS and GREG ELLIS |
| WADE DREW BRAYMAN |
| SEAN MAGUIRE and GREGG ELLIS |
| 22-1299 |
| April 22, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Prisoner Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGMENT entered by David J. Barron, Chief Appellate Judge; Jeffrey R. Howard, Appellate Judge and Gustavo A. Gelpi, Jr., Appellate Judge. Dismissed. [22-1299] (GB) [Entered: 06/03/2022 04:10 PM] |
| RESPONSE filed by Appellant Wade Drew Brayman to the court's show cause order dated May 9, 2022 [ # 6494739-2 ]. Certificate of service was not included. [22-1299] (GB) [Entered: 05/20/2022 02:53 PM] |
ORDER denying as moot motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Wade Drew Brayman. [22-1299] (GAK) [Entered: 05/11/2022 11:29 AM]
|
|
ORDER to Show Cause entered. It is hereby ordered that appellant either move for voluntary dismissal under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) or show cause, in writing, why this appeal should not be dismissed. The failure to take either action by May 23, 2022 may lead to dismissal of the appeal for lack of diligent prosecution. [22-1299] (GB) [Entered: 05/09/2022 12:12 PM]
|
| MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Wade Drew Brayman. Certificate of service was not included. [22-1299] (GB) [Entered: 05/09/2022 04:32 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #55) filed by Appellant Wade Drew Brayman. [22-1299]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (GB) [Entered: 04/22/2022 01:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
