Plazzi, et al v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
| MATHEUS PLAZZI, JOSHUA PRESCOTT and TULIO BRITO COSTA |
| FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. |
| 22-1365 |
| May 22, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other Labor Litigation |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Plazzi v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
JUDGMENT entered. Upon consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged and decreed as follows: The district court's judgment is vacated, and the matter is remanded with instructions to conduct supplemental briefing on whether to remand the action to state court consistent with the opinion issued this day. Costs are awarded to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. [22-1365] (GB) [Entered: 10/20/2022 04:05 PM]
|
|
OPINION issued by David J. Barron, Chief Appellate Judge; Sandra L. Lynch, Appellate Judge and Gustavo A. Gelp , Jr., Appellate Judge. Published. [22-1365] (GB) [Entered: 10/20/2022 04:01 PM]
|
|
BILL of costs filed by Appellee FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.. Served on 10/20/2022. [22-1365] (BR) [Entered: 10/20/2022 07:34 PM]
|
|
CASE argued. Panel: David J. Barron, Chief Appellate Judge; Sandra L. Lynch, Appellate Judge and Gustavo A. Gelpi, Jr., Appellate Judge. Arguing attorneys: Shannon Erika Liss-Riordan for Matheus Plazzi, Joshua Prescott and Tulio Brito Costa and Brian Ruocco for FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.. [22-1365] (DJT) [Entered: 10/06/2022 01:41 PM]
|
|
NINE (9) paper copies of reply brief [ # 6518250-2 ] submitted by Appellants Tulio Brito Costa, Matheus Plazzi and Joshua Prescott. [22-1365] (YCC) [Entered: 09/08/2022 11:48 AM]
|
|
REPLY BRIEF filed by Appellants Tulio Brito Costa, Matheus Plazzi and Joshua Prescott. Served on 09/06/2022. Nine paper copies identical to that of the electronically filed brief must be submitted so that they are received by the court on or before 09/13/2022 . [22-1365] (LIM) [Entered: 09/07/2022 09:00 AM]
|
|
BRIEF tendered by Appellants Tulio Brito Costa, Matheus Plazzi and Joshua Prescott. [22-1365] (SEL) [Entered: 09/06/2022 05:50 PM]
|
|
DESIGNATION of attorney presenting oral argument filed by Attorney Brian Ruocco for Appellee FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.. Served on 08/29/2022. [22-1365] (BR) [Entered: 08/29/2022 04:34 PM]
|
|
DESIGNATION of attorney presenting oral argument filed by Attorney Shannon Erika Liss-Riordan for Appellants Tulio Brito Costa, Matheus Plazzi and Joshua Prescott. Served on 08/29/2022. [22-1365] (SEL) [Entered: 08/29/2022 05:16 PM]
|
|
CASE calendared: This case is presently scheduled to be called for oral argument on Thursday, October 6, 2022 at 9:30 a.m. in Boston, MA in the En Banc Courtroom at the Moakley Courthouse. There will be no continuance except for grave cause. Designation form due 08/29/2022. [22-1365] (DJT) [Entered: 08/24/2022 11:35 AM]
|
|
NINE (9) paper copies of appellee's brief [ # 6513985-2 ] submitted by Appellee FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.. [22-1365] (YCC) [Entered: 08/19/2022 12:37 PM]
|
|
DISCLOSURE statement filed by Appellee FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. Served on 08/15/2022. [22-1365] (AVN) [Entered: 08/16/2022 10:43 AM]
|
|
APPELLEE'S BRIEF filed by Appellee FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. Served on 08/15/2022. Nine paper copies identical to that of the electronically filed brief must be submitted so that they are received by the court on or before 08/23/2022 . Reply brief due 09/06/2022 for APPELLANTS Tulio Brito Costa, Matheus Plazzi and Joshua Prescott. [22-1365] (AVN) [Entered: 08/16/2022 10:42 AM]
|
|
BRIEF tendered by Appellee FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.. [22-1365] (BR) [Entered: 08/15/2022 12:44 PM]
|
|
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. filed by Attorney Frederick R. Yarger. Served on 07/27/2022. [22-1365] (FRY) [Entered: 07/27/2022 10:10 AM]
|
|
NINE (9) paper copies of appellant/petitioner brief [ # 6508142-2 ] submitted by Appellants Tulio Brito Costa, Matheus Plazzi and Joshua Prescott. [22-1365] (ATC) [Entered: 07/21/2022 03:04 PM]
|
|
FIVE (5) paper copies of appendix [ # 6508150-2 ] submitted by Appellants Tulio Brito Costa, Matheus Plazzi and Joshua Prescott. [22-1365] (ATC) [Entered: 07/21/2022 03:05 PM]
|
|
APPENDIX filed by Appellants Tulio Brito Costa, Matheus Plazzi and Joshua Prescott. Served on 07/15/2022. Five paper copies of the electronically filed appendix must be submitted so that they are received by the court on or before 07/25/2022 [22-1365] (LIM) [Entered: 07/18/2022 09:43 AM]
|
|
APPELLANTS' BRIEF filed by Appellants Tulio Brito Costa, Matheus Plazzi and Joshua Prescott. Served on 07/15/2022. Nine paper copies identical to that of the electronically filed brief must be submitted so that they are received by the court on or before 07/25/2022 . Brief due 08/15/2022 for APPELLEE FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. [22-1365] (LIM) [Entered: 07/18/2022 09:26 AM]
|
|
APPENDIX tendered by Appellants Tulio Brito Costa, Matheus Plazzi and Joshua Prescott. Served on 07/15/2022. [22-1365] (SEL) [Entered: 07/15/2022 02:13 PM]
|
|
BRIEF tendered by Appellants Tulio Brito Costa, Matheus Plazzi and Joshua Prescott. [22-1365] (SEL) [Entered: 07/15/2022 02:12 PM]
|
|
NOTICE of filing the following transcript in district court by Court Reporter Kelly Mortellite: 03/02/2022, Teleconference. In accordance with Judicial Conference Policy, the transcript will not be available to the public by remote electronic access for ninety days after the filing date. During that ninety day period, the transcript may be purchased through the court reporter or viewed at the public terminal at the district court. [22-1365] (GB) [Entered: 07/20/2022 04:07 PM]
|
|
NOTICE issued. The following attorneys have failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: Cheryl B. Pinarchick for FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., David J. Schaller for FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and Jessica G. Scott for FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.. [22-1365] (GB) [Entered: 06/22/2022 09:32 AM]
|
|
NOTICE of filing the following transcript in district court by Court Reporter Kelly Mortellite: 03/12/2022, Hearing on Motion to Dismiss. In accordance with Judicial Conference Policy, the transcript will not be available to the public by remote electronic access for ninety days after the filing date. During that ninety day period, the transcript may be purchased through the court reporter or viewed at the public terminal at the district court. [22-1365] (GB) [Entered: 07/11/2022 09:57 AM]
|
|
TRANSCRIPT ordered: 03/12/2022, Motion to Dismiss Hearing. Transcript due 07/08/2022 from Court Reporter Kelly Mortellite [22-1365] (GB) [Entered: 06/08/2022 02:55 PM]
|
|
TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellee FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. indicating transcripts are being ordered. Served on 06/08/2022. [22-1365] (BR) [Entered: 06/08/2022 02:11 PM]
|
|
NOTICE issued. After 06/21/2022, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Cheryl B. Pinarchick for FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., David J. Schaller for FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and Jessica G. Scott for FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.. [22-1365] (GB) [Entered: 06/07/2022 06:01 AM]
|
|
NOTICE filed by Appellee FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.. Served on 06/06/2022. [22-1365] CLERK'S NOTE: The ECF Filer did not choose the best option to describe the document, the incorrect event was chosen. THE FILER IS DIRECTED TO RE-FILE THE DOCUMENT WITHIN TWO DAYS, BY 06/09/2022. (BR) [Entered: 06/06/2022 04:18 PM]
|
|
BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 07/15/2022 for appellants Tulio Brito Costa, Matheus Plazzi and Joshua Prescott. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [22-1365] (GB) [Entered: 06/05/2022 07:26 PM]
|
|
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellants Matheus Plazzi, Joshua Prescott and Tulio Brito Costa filed by Attorney Harold Lichten. Served on 06/02/2022. [22-1365] (HLL) [Entered: 06/02/2022 05:15 PM]
|
|
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellants Tulio Brito Costa, Matheus Plazzi and Joshua Prescott filed by Attorney Shannon Liss-Riordan. Served on 06/02/2022. [22-1365] (SEL) [Entered: 06/02/2022 05:14 PM]
|
|
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellants Matheus Plazzi, Tulio Brito Costa and Joshua Prescott filed by Attorney Zach Rubin. Served on 06/02/2022. [22-1365] (ZLR) [Entered: 06/02/2022 05:18 PM]
|
|
DOCKETING statement filed by Appellants Matheus Plazzi, Tulio Brito Costa and Joshua Prescott. Served on 06/02/2022. [22-1365] (SEL) [Entered: 06/02/2022 05:22 PM]
|
|
TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellants Matheus Plazzi, Tulio Brito Costa and Joshua Prescott indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. Served on 06/02/2022. [22-1365] (SEL) [Entered: 06/02/2022 05:23 PM]
|
|
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellants Matheus Plazzi, Tulio Brito Costa and Joshua Prescott filed by Attorney Michelle Cassorla. Served on 06/02/2022. [22-1365] (MC) [Entered: 06/02/2022 05:20 PM]
|
|
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. filed by Attorney Brian T. Ruocco. Served on 05/23/2022. [22-1365] (BR) [Entered: 05/23/2022 04:16 PM]
|
|
CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #24) filed by Appellants Tulio Brito Costa, Matheus Plazzi and Joshua Prescott. Appearance form, Docketing Statement and Transcript Report/Order form due 06/06/2022 . [22-1365] (GB) [Entered: 05/22/2022 06:41 AM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
