Goguen v. US
Petitioner / Appellant: ROBERT FREDERICK GOGUEN
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Case Number: 22-1386
Filed: May 19, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 5, 2022 LETTER filed by Appellant Robert Frederick Goguen advising court of new address and requesting copies of recent filings in 21-1741, 21-1752, 22-1386. Certificate of service was not included. [21-1741, 21-1752, 22-1386] (JAW) [Entered: 07/07/2022 05:04 PM]
June 24, 2022 Mail returned as undeliverable to Appellant Robert Frederick Goguen. Copy of order issued June 6, 2022. Forwarded to FCI Edgefield PO Box 725 Edgefield, SC 29824. [22-1386] (ATC) [Entered: 06/28/2022 02:25 PM]
June 15, 2022 LETTER sent to Appellant Robert Frederick Goguen enclosing a one-time copy of his motion for certificate of appealability. [22-1386] (GAK) [Entered: 06/15/2022 02:12 PM]
June 9, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER advising petitioner the request for a certificate of appealability will be submitted to this court for a decision. Date of denial by district court: April 28, 2022. [22-1386] (GAK) [Entered: 06/09/2022 09:08 AM]
June 6, 2022 NOTICE of default issued. Appellant failed to file a transcript report/order form by the deadline. If transcripts are necessary for this appeal, appellant is directed to file a transcript order form by 06/20/2022 . Absent a timely response, this court will set a briefing schedule, if appropriate. [22-1386] (JAW) [Entered: 06/06/2022 05:04 PM]
May 23, 2022 LETTER filed by Appellant Robert Frederick Goguen requesting a copy of the motion for certificate of appealability. Certificate of service was not included. [22-1386] (JAW) [Entered: 06/08/2022 04:37 PM]
May 23, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER directing petitioner to file a request for a certificate of appealabilty in this court by 06/22/2022 . Date of denial by district court: April 28, 2022. [22-1386] (JAW) [Entered: 05/23/2022 05:09 PM]
May 23, 2022 MOTION for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Robert Frederick Goguen. Certificate of service was not included. [22-1386] (JAW) [Entered: 06/08/2022 04:28 PM]
May 19, 2022 SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. Docket entry: 417 - Order denying motion for relief from judgment and for the appointment of counsel and denying certificate of appealability. [22-1386] (JAW) [Entered: 06/08/2022 03:58 PM]
May 19, 2022 CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #419) filed by Appellant Robert Frederick Goguen. Transcript Report/Order form due 06/02/2022. [22-1386] (JAW) [Entered: 05/19/2022 11:06 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Goguen v. US
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: ROBERT FREDERICK GOGUEN
Represented By: Robert Frederick Goguen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES
Represented By: Benjamin M. Block
Represented By: Frank Todd Lowell
Represented By: Jody B. Mullis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?