Patel, et al v. Blinken, et al
MEGHA PATEL and PRATIK KUMAR AMRUTLAL PATEL |
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, Secretary of State, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and DONNA P. CAMPAGNOLO, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center |
22-1431 |
June 3, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
Other Immigration Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 08/31/2022 for appellant Megha Patel and Pratik Kumar Amrutlal Patel. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [22-1431] (JAW) [Entered: 07/22/2022 12:13 PM] |
DOCKETING statement filed by Appellants Megha Patel and Pratik Kumar Amrutlal Patel. Served on 06/13/2022. [22-1431] (TS) [Entered: 06/13/2022 04:41 PM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellants Megha Patel and Pratik Kumar Amrutlal Patel filed by Attorney Thomas Stylianos, Jr.. Served on 06/13/2022. [22-1431] (TS) [Entered: 06/13/2022 04:34 PM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellees Alejandro Mayorkas, Donna P. Campagnolo, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Antony J. Blinken filed by Attorney Mark Sauter. Served on 06/13/2022. [22-1431] (MS) [Entered: 06/13/2022 03:35 PM] |
CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #12) filed by Appellants Megha Patel and Pratik Kumar Amrutlal Patel. Appearance form and Docketing Statement due 06/17/2022. [22-1431] (JAW) [Entered: 06/03/2022 08:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.