Arrington v. The City of Boston, et al
| MICHAEL DEWAYNE ARRINGTON |
| BOSTON, MA, HORACE COLEMAN, GREGORY LONG, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner of the Boston Police Department and WILLIAM G. GROSS, in his individual capacity |
| 22-1589 |
| August 1, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing fee was paid in the district court by Appellant Michael Dewayne Arrington on 08/15/2022. [22-1589] (ALW) [Entered: 08/26/2022 01:43 PM] |
| SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. Docket entry: 58 (Electronic notice indicating that the appeal fee was paid in the District Court). [22-1589] (ALW) [Entered: 08/26/2022 01:41 PM] |
| NOTICE of default and intent to dismiss for failure to pay the filing fee. Fee due 09/06/2022. [22-1589] (ALW) [Entered: 08/23/2022 11:25 AM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Michael Dewayne Arrington. Served on 08/21/2022. [22-1589] (MDA) [Entered: 08/21/2022 02:34 AM] |
| TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Michael Dewayne Arrington indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. Served on 08/15/2022. [22-1589] (MDA) [Entered: 08/15/2022 03:48 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #55 ) filed by Appellant Michael Dewayne Arrington. Fee due 08/15/2022.. [22-1589] (ALW) [Entered: 08/01/2022 04:17 PM] |
| Public docket note: Gregory Long was named Acting Commissioner of the Boston Police Department on February 3, 2021. We have substituted him for William Gross, as the appellee, in his official capacity only. See Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2). [22-1589] (ALW) [Entered: 08/01/2022 04:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
