Alvarez-Llorens v. Torres-Ortiz
DAMARYS BATISTA-RODRIGUEZ, in her personal capacity and in her official capacity as Human Resources Director of the Municipality of Yauco |
JOSE LUIS ALVAREZ-LLORENS |
ANGEL LUIS TORRES-ORTIZ, in his official capacity as Mayor of the Municipality of Yauco |
22-1590 |
August 3, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
Employment |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing fee was paid in the district court by Appellant Jose Luis Alvarez-Llorens on 07/13/2022. [22-1590] (JAW) [Entered: 09/13/2022 02:14 PM] |
ORDER entered: The default notice issued on September 12, 2022, is hereby vacated as issued in error. [22-1590] (JAW) [Entered: 09/13/2022 03:50 PM] |
NOTICE of default and intent to dismiss for failure to pay the filing fee. Fee due 09/26/2022. [22-1590] (JAW) [Entered: 09/12/2022 09:30 AM] |
NOTICE Notice about payment of filing fees on July 13, 2022 at the District Court in San Juan Puerto Rico. filed by Appellant Jose Luis Alvarez-Llorens. Served on 09/12/2022. [22-1590] (JJN) [Entered: 09/12/2022 11:47 AM] |
NOTICE issued. The following attorneys have failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: Michel Mir-Martinez for Angel Luis Torres-Ortiz and Damarys Batista-Rodriguez and Michel Mir-Martinez for Damarys Batista-Rodriguez. [22-1590] (JAW) [Entered: 09/07/2022 09:03 AM] |
ORDER entered: Construing Appellant Jose Luis Alvarez-Llorens's Notice as a motion to amend the caption, the request is denied. See Fed. R. App. P. 12(a) (" . . . the circuit clerk must docket the appeal under the title of the district court action. . ."). Parties named as a plaintiff and defendant in the district court therefore remain as a plaintiff and defendant, although not necessarily an appellant or appellee, in this appeal. [22-1590] (JAW) [Entered: 08/22/2022 03:14 PM] |
ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant Jose Luis Alvarez-Llorens. Brief and Appendix due 10/20/2022 for appellant Jose Luis Alvarez-Llorens. [22-1590] (JAW) [Entered: 08/22/2022 07:01 PM] |
NOTICE issued. After 09/06/2022, the following attorneys will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Michel Mir-Martinez for Angel Luis Torres-Ortiz and Damarys Batista-Rodriguez. [22-1590] (JAW) [Entered: 08/22/2022 02:29 PM] |
NOTICE Notice that Mrs. Damarys Batista-Rodriguez is no longer a party to this case since April 22, 2020. filed by Appellant Jose Luis Alvarez-Llorens. Served on 08/19/2022. [22-1590] (JJN) [Entered: 08/19/2022 02:45 PM] |
MOTION to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant Jose Luis Alvarez-Llorens. Served on 08/19/2022. [22-1590] (JJN) [Entered: 08/19/2022 02:15 PM] |
BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 09/20/2022 for appellant Jose Luis Alvarez-Llorens. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [22-1590] (JAW) [Entered: 08/11/2022 04:35 PM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Angel Luis Torres-Ortiz filed by Attorney Jorge Martinez-Luciano. Served on 08/05/2022. [22-1590] (JM) [Entered: 08/05/2022 03:47 PM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Angel Luis Torres-Ortiz filed by Attorney Emil Rodriguez-Escudero. Served on 08/05/2022. [22-1590] (EJR) [Entered: 08/05/2022 04:32 PM] |
DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Jose Luis Alvarez-Llorens. Served on 08/05/2022. [22-1590] (JJN) [Entered: 08/05/2022 06:55 PM] |
NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Jose Luis Alvarez-Llorens filed by Attorney Juan Jos Nolla-Acosta. Served on 08/05/2022. [22-1590] (JJN) [Entered: 08/05/2022 06:52 PM] |
CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #113) filed by Appellant Jose Luis Alvarez-Llorens. Appearance form, Docketing Statement, and Fee due 08/17/2022. [22-1590] (JAW) [Entered: 08/03/2022 09:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Alvarez-Llorens v. Torres-Ortiz | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: JOSE LUIS ALVAREZ-LLORENS | |
Represented By: | Juan Jose Nolla-Acosta |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: ANGEL LUIS TORRES-ORTIZ, in his official capacity as Mayor of the Municipality of Yauco | |
Represented By: | Jorge Martinez-Luciano |
Represented By: | Michel Mir-Martinez |
Represented By: | Emil J. Rodriguez-Escudero |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: DAMARYS BATISTA-RODRIGUEZ, in her personal capacity and in her official capacity as Human Resources Director of the Municipality of Yauco | |
Represented By: | Jorge Martinez-Luciano |
Represented By: | Michel Mir-Martinez |
Represented By: | Emil J. Rodriguez-Escudero |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.