Jones v. Maine State Police Department
| MATTHEW JONES |
| MAINE STATE POLICE and MAINE STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT |
| 22-1638 |
| August 15, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF filed by Appellant Matthew Jones in 22-1638, 22-1639. Number of copies: 4. Served on 09/20/2022. [22-1638, 22-1639] (AVN) [Entered: 09/23/2022 03:15 PM] |
ORDER entered by Sandra L. Lynch, Appellate Judge: Plaintiff's Motion to Combine Appeals is resolved as follows: Appeal Nos. 22-1638 and 22-1638 are consolidated for purposes of briefing and disposition. The current briefing orders in each case remain in place, but plaintiff need only file one combined brief. [22-1638, 22-1639] (GRC) [Entered: 09/14/2022 02:12 PM]
|
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 10/12/2022 for appellant Matthew Jones. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [22-1638] (GRC) [Entered: 09/02/2022 04:40 PM] |
| MOTION to consolidate cases for purposes of briefing and oral argument filed by Appellant Matthew Jones in 22-1638 and 22-1639. [22-1638, 22-1639] (GRC) [Entered: 08/30/2022 01:12 PM] |
| LETTER filed by the Office of the Attorney General for the state of Maine. [22-1638] (GRC) [Entered: 08/24/2022 04:06 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #10) filed by Appellant Mathew Jones. [22-1638] (GRC) [Entered: 08/15/2022 04:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
