Adrian v. Moniz
Respondent: US DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY, IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and PLYMOUTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Petitioner / Appellant: LUSHIKU NDOWA ADRIAN and LUSHIKU NDOWA ADRIAN, a/k/a Mukonkole Huge Kifwa
Respondent / Appellee: ANTONE MONIZ
Case Number: 22-1673
Filed: September 1, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2022 BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 12/05/2022 for appellant Lushiku Ndowa Adrian. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [22-1673] (GRC) [Entered: 10/26/2022 12:19 PM]
October 3, 2022 Request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal filed by Appellant Lushiku Ndowa Adrian was granted in the district court by order dated 09/29/2022. [22-1673] (GRC) [Entered: 10/03/2022 04:46 PM]
October 3, 2022 SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. Docket entry: 41(order granting in forma pauperis). [22-1673] (GRC) [Entered: 10/03/2022 04:45 PM]
September 1, 2022 CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #34) filed by Appellant Lushiku Ndowa Adrian. Fee due 09/15/2022. [22-1673] (GRC) [Entered: 09/01/2022 03:06 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Adrian v. Moniz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: LUSHIKU NDOWA ADRIAN
Represented By: Lushiku Ndowa Adrian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: LUSHIKU NDOWA ADRIAN, a/k/a Mukonkole Huge Kifwa
Represented By: Lushiku Ndowa Adrian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: ANTONE MONIZ
Represented By: Michael L. Fitzgerald
Represented By: Donald Campbell Lockhart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: US DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Represented By: Donald Campbell Lockhart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Represented By: Donald Campbell Lockhart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: PLYMOUTH COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?