Strahan v. O'Reilly, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN
Defendant / Appellee: SEAN O'REILLY, PATRICK COSTINDE, JOSEPH DIGREGORIO, JAMES DECKER, CHERI PATTERSON and PATRICK COSTIN
Interested Party: TRACY BIRMINGHAM and STEVEN LEE
Case Number: 22-1699
Filed: September 16, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER to Show Cause entered. Plaintiff-appellant has filed a notice of appeal in Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-00052-SM (D. N.H.) challenging the September 6, 2022 order (D.E. No. 70) terminating plaintiff's motions seeking injunctive relief (D.E. Nos. 44, 46 and 51). The denial of injunctive relief is generally appealable on an interlocutory basis. See 28 U.S.C. 1292(a)(1). However, the district court subsequently dismissed the underlying case. Under the circumstances, this appeal appears to be moot. See Capriole v. Uber Techs., Inc., 991 F.3d 339, 343 (1st Cir. 2021) ("[A]n appeal from the denial of a preliminary injunction motion becomes moot when final judgment issues because the district court's denial of the motion merges with the final judgment."); see also Harris v. Univ. of Mass. Lowell , 43 F.4th 187, 191 n.6 (1st Cir. 2022) (finding plaintiffs' complaints on appeal concerning denial of preliminary injunction to be moot given final judgment dismissing the case). Accordingly, plaintiff-appellant is ordered either to move for voluntary dismissal of this appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or to show cause, in writing filed by November 14, 2022 , why this appeal should not be dismissed as moot. The failure to take either action will lead to dismissal of the appeal for lack of diligent prosecution. See 1st Cir. R. 3.0 (b). [22-1699] (ALW) [Entered: 10/31/2022 10:16 AM]
September 21, 2022 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Joseph Digregorio filed by Attorney Marrielle B. Van Rossum, Esq.. Served on 09/21/2022. [22-1699] (MBV) [Entered: 09/21/2022 11:09 AM]
September 19, 2022 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Joseph Digregorio filed by Attorney Donald L. Smith. Served on 09/19/2022. [22-1699] (DLS) [Entered: 09/19/2022 01:08 PM]
September 16, 2022 CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #74 ) filed by Appellant Richard Maximus Strahan. [22-1699]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (ALW) [Entered: 09/16/2022 10:24 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Strahan v. O'Reilly, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN
Represented By: Richard Maximus Strahan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SEAN O'REILLY
Represented By: Brian J.S. Cullen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PATRICK COSTINDE
Represented By: Brian J.S. Cullen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOSEPH DIGREGORIO
Represented By: Karyl Roberts Martin
Represented By: Donald L. Smith
Represented By: Marrielle B. Van Rossum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JAMES DECKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHERI PATTERSON
Represented By: Christopher Goldwasser Aslin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PATRICK COSTIN
Represented By: Brian J.S. Cullen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: TRACY BIRMINGHAM
Represented By: Donald L. Smith
Represented By: Marrielle B. Van Rossum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: STEVEN LEE
Represented By: Donald L. Smith
Represented By: Marrielle B. Van Rossum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?